PubMed · 1168342
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D Rosseinsky. 1975-03-06. Once a blessing.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1168342/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
We have always known that some form of clock is needed to measure time. It now seems that a variety of different neural clocks are involved in determining our temporal perceptions, some specialised for shorter and some for longer durations.
Propagation of waves in an extended excitable system is considered. It is shown that traveling wave fronts can be triggered and maintained via local periodic modulations of an appropriate system parameter. For a finite range of perturbation frequencies, this new class of pacemakers introduces spatiotemporal self-organization in an otherwise quiescent medium. Excitation waves of activity similar to those observed in heart tissue cultures and other biological preparations can emerge in the presence of these pacemakers.
BACKGROUND: Reappearance of low-frequency (LF) (+/-0.10 Hz) oscillations in RR interval (RR) after cardiac transplantation is indicative of sympathetic efferent reinnervation. We hypothesized that restored LF oscillations in RR in heart transplant recipients (HTRs) are linked to oscillations in muscle sympathetic nerve traffic (MSNA). METHODS AND RESULTS: RR, RR variability, and MSNA were recorded 5+/-2 months (n=7, short-term HTRs) and 138+/-8 months (n=7, long-term HTRs) after heart transplantation and compared with matched hypertensive patients (n=7). A coherence function determined the coupling between LF oscillations in MSNA and RR. RR variance did not differ between short-term and long-term HTRs. However, LF variability was only 1+/-0.5 ms(2) in the short-term HTRs but was 15+/-8 ms(2) in the long-term HTRs (P<0.05). Normalized LF variability was also higher in the long-term HTRs (40+/-14 normalized unites) versus the short-term HTRs (6+/-3 normalized united, P<0.05) but did not differ from the LF variability of the hypertensive patients. Long-term HTRs were taking less cyclosporine (P<0.01) but had higher MSNA than the short-term HTRs (62+/-7 versus 31+/-7 burst/min, respectively, P<0.05). Coherence between LF oscillations in MSNA and RR was similar in the long-term HTRs (0.59+/-0.11) and the hypertensive patients (0.60+/-0.07) and was 3-fold greater than in the short-term HTRs (0.20+/-0.06, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac reinnervation after long-term heart transplantation is characterized by a restoration of the coherence between LF oscillations in RR and MSNA. Higher MSNA in long-term than in short-term HTRs suggests that time elapsed after cardiac transplantation may be a major determinant of sympathetic excitation in heart transplant recipients.