Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11641866

[Physicians today].

Abstract

The last few years have witnessed radical changes in medical practices due to scientific and technological developments, the population's demands, the evolution of the economy, the optimisation of resources, the Media, not forgetting the major ethical, legal and political aspects, which have changed considerably in just a few years. Basic training, specialised training and ongoing training must allow doctors to assume many of these changes, although in general in should be they who are willing to put such changes into practice. Education and training should be modified to make it easier and faster to assume these changes. Medicine is no longer what it used to be: instead of being limited, knowledge is now boundless, instead of working alone, doctors now work in teams, instead of only the doctor having the information, patients now have it too. There has been a move from the ethics of welfare to the ethics Of autonomy, from problem-free spending to cost containment, from the demand for relief to the demand for treatment and healing, from a call for health to a call for quality of health, from non-judicialisation, and so on and so forth. All these factors have clearly affected the structure of medicine, and it is not surprising that nowadays there is more talk about the prestige of medicine that the prestige of the doctor, as occurred not so many years ago. There is really no substitute for individual attitudes to this situation. The article contains certain considerations about how current changes are affecting doctor's attitudes and the need not only to accept the change but also to lead it. The competitive doctor of today must meet a broad spectrum of requirements, ranging from initiative and flexibility to technological know-how-and capacity. Nowadays society is moving towards a situation in which it not only demands and expects these conditions from its leaders but also from all doctors. Patients have an increasingly higher level of education and, as such, are becoming more demanding because they have tools with which to compare and demand more from doctors.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Díaz-Rubio García. 2001. [Physicians today].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11641866/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The integration of molecular diagnostics with therapeutics. Implications for drug development and pathology practice.

It is widely anticipated that during the next 5 years the molecular diagnostic industry will continue to grow at double-digit pace to meet increasing demand for personalized medicine. A wide variety of drugs in late preclinical and early clinical development are being targeted to disease-specific gene and protein defects that will require coapproval of diagnostic and therapeutic products by regulatory agencies. An increasingly educated public will demand more information about their predisposition for serious diseases and how these potential illnesses can be detected in an early stage when they can be arrested or cured with new therapies custom-designed for their individual clinical status. To respond to this demand, major pharmaceutical companies will partner with diagnostics companies or develop their own in-house capabilities that will permit efficient production of more effective and less toxic integrated personalized medicine drug and test products. For clinical laboratories and pathologists, this integration of diagnostics and therapeutics represents a major new opportunity to emerge as leaders of the new medicine, guiding the selection, dosage, route of administration, and multidrug combinations and producing increased efficacy and reduced toxicity of pharmaceutical products.

Clinical Medicine↗