Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11640715

[Not Available].

Abstract

This paper condenses legal thought elaborated during the late Middle Ages by law doctors regarding rules to be observed during the plague. What they thought about this problem was scattered through wide commentaries on Roman and Canon law. Those hints were gathered by three Italian jurists working at the beginning of the XVI century, at the time of a strong, new epidemic wave (1522-1523). Italy showed again its primacy in the growth of the peculiar Continental common law. In the first part of this work we present the legal rules dealing with prevention, i.e. what lawyers could learn concerning good government of a city from old texts. This is interesting because this teaching gave a model referred to public powers all over Europe. In this way old teachings were transferred to modern governors, who had the opportunity to select the alternatives offered by ancient wisdom and its recent interpretations. The three 'tractatus' we refer to were written at the same time independently of each other. However, we shall see that they have many common conclusions, because they derive from the same cultural environment. The three authors worked in Bologna, Avignon and Pisa, but with the same legal sources which were at that time the same all over Continental Europe. From these works it is possible to understand how wise the different provisions issued by the local government were. In the second and final part of this work regulations during the plague for private business will be illustrated.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Ascheri. 1995. [Not Available].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11640715/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Recurrence risk to offspring in extended multiplex schizophrenia pedigrees from a Pacific Island isolate.

Genetic transmission plays a major role in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Family, twin, and adoption studies have consistently shown that risks in relatives are many times greater than the general population risk of approximately 1%. McGue, Gottesman, and Rao (1983; Am J Hum Genet 35:1161-1178) calculated risk estimates of 12.8% for offspring and 3.5% for nieces/nephews of schizophrenia patients based on a large data set of Western European families. The present study evaluated corresponding risk levels in Palau, an isolated population in Micronesia where the prevalence of narrowly (broadly) defined schizophrenia is 1.99% (2.67%) and cases cluster in extended pedigrees, 20 of which contain 80% of affected individuals. We hypothesized that offspring in these extended families would have a higher risk for schizophrenia than offspring in smaller schizophrenia pedigrees from more genetically heterogeneous populations. RDC diagnostic data based on complete ascertainment of cases and their families covering the past two generations were used to quantify empirical recurrence risks in the offspring and nieces/nephews of Palauan schizophrenia patients. Risks to 1st- and 2nd-degree offspring were approximately double the rates found in the smaller Western European families: 23.4% in the offspring of an affected parent, 6.4% in offspring with one affected aunt/uncle, and 15.0% in offspring with two or more affected aunts/uncles. Recurrence rates in offspring of an affected parent were 1.6 times higher in males (27.9%) than in females (17.7%). The high risk levels we found in Palauan offspring reflect the elevated population prevalence, strong familial aggregation, and multi-lineal transmission pattern of schizophrenia in Palau.

Europe↗