Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11628836

[Not Available].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J L Plessis. 1982. [Not Available].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11628836/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular morbidity is a major burden in patients with type 2 diabetes. In the Steno-2 Study, we compared the effect of a targeted, intensified, multifactorial intervention with that of conventional treatment on modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. METHODS: The primary end point of this open, parallel trial was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, revascularization, and amputation. Eighty patients were randomly assigned to receive conventional treatment in accordance with national guidelines and 80 to receive intensive treatment, with a stepwise implementation of behavior modification and pharmacologic therapy that targeted hyperglycemia, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and microalbuminuria, along with secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease with aspirin. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 55.1 years, and the mean follow-up was 7.8 years. The decline in glycosylated hemoglobin values, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels measured after an overnight fast, and urinary albumin excretion rate were all significantly greater in the intensive-therapy group than in the conventional-therapy group. Patients receiving intensive therapy also had a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular disease (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.73), nephropathy (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.17 to 0.87), retinopathy (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.21 to 0.86), and autonomic neuropathy (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: A target-driven, long-term, intensified intervention aimed at multiple risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria reduces the risk of cardiovascular and microvascular events by about 50 percent.

Amputation, Surgical↗

Factors associated with future amputation among patients undergoing hemodialysis: results from the Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study Waves 3 and 4.

BACKGROUND: Amputation is more common in hemodialysis patients than in the general population, but risk factors for amputation in this population have not been studied extensively. METHODS: We used the US Renal Data System Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study Waves 3 and 4 in combination with Medicare discharge data to identify factors associated with lower-extremity amputation (excluding toe amputations) in hemodialysis patients. We used stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify variables most strongly associated with amputation within 2 years of the study start date. RESULTS: Male sex, diabetes, previous diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease (PVD), mean systolic blood pressure, and elevated serum phosphorus level were associated with the outcome of amputation within 2 years of the study start date. Among patients without diabetes, a previous diagnosis of cardiac disease, longer time from initiation of dialysis therapy (vintage), and previous hospitalization for limb ischemia were associated with increased risk for future amputation. CONCLUSION: The importance of preventing amputation in this population cannot be overemphasized. The strength of the association of amputation with PVD makes a strong case for screening all dialysis patients for this disease. The association of amputation with serum phosphorus level reported here should be explored further because this may offer an avenue for future intervention to reduce amputation rates.

Amputation, Surgical↗

Posterior arthroscopic approach to the ankle: an anatomic study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to verify the safety of a new technique for a posterior arthroscopic approach to the ankle. This technique was recently described in literature. The technique uses a modified posteromedial portal, a different way of introducing the instruments into the portal, and the tendon of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) as a landmark to work in the posterior compartment. TYPE OF STUDY: Anatomic study. METHODS: The technique was performed on 10 (4 fresh and 6 fresh-frozen) below-knee amputation specimens, which were then dissected. The instruments were left in place, and anatomic dissections were performed to determine the relationship to the surrounding neurovascular structures. Then the instruments were removed, and the distance of the neurovascular structures from the posteromedial portal was recorded. Another medial portal, 1 cm more proximal, was also created to measure the distance of this latter portal from the nervous structures. RESULTS: None of the anatomic dissections showed injuries to the neurovascular bundle either during penetration of the instruments or during procedures in the posterior compartment laterally to the tendon of the FHL. This latter is the landmark to prevent damage to the more medially located nerves and vessels. The new posteromedial portal is located, on average, 13.3 mm (range, 11 to 17 mm) from the posterior tibial nerve, 14.7 mm (range, 8 to 20) from the calcaneal branch (which may be single or multiple, and may vary as needed the height of bifurcation from the posterior tibial nerve), and 17.3 mm (range, 15 to 21 mm) from the posterior tibial artery. A posteromedial portal located 1 cm more proximally is on average 2.9 mm closer to the nervous structures. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these anatomic data, there appears to be relatively little risk to the surrounding neurovascular structures with this new technique. Therefore, this technique appears to be relatively safe in the treatment of intra-articular and extra-articular pathology.

Amputation, Surgical↗