PubMed · 11577030
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A Rosenzweig, S Cook. 2001-09-28. Interpretation of transcript profiling.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11577030/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Many investigators have reported that extended lymph node dissection (D2 dissection) is probably an effective procedure. However, the theory that D2 dissection leads to an improvement in survival has not been confirmed in randomized trials. We attempted to confirm the effectiveness of D2 dissection with gastrectomy for gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gastric cancer patients (1403) underwent curative resection by D1 (991 patients) or D2 (412 patients) dissection with gastrectomy. Survival rates calculated for all patients and subdivided for stage, depth of invasion, and lymph node metastasis were compared between the two groups. The diagnosis of lymph node metastasis was compared between macroscopic and histological findings. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the survival of patients overall. However, in the patients with stage II, T1 or T2, or N1 disease, the survival of the D2 group was significantly better than that of the D1 group. The false positive rates of lymph node metastasis were 53.3% in the N1 group, 26.2% in the N2 group, and 9.2% in the N3 group. In a considerable proportion of the N1 and N2 patients, histological findings proved more or fewer metastases than macroscopic diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Metastatic lymph nodes should be resected as far as possible. D2 dissection with gastrectomy is recommended for T1, N1 or T2, N1 disease, particularly in younger patients.
This study of Plasmodium falciparum malaria evaluated patterns of fluorescent reticulocyte measurements as determined with the Abbott Cell-Dyn CD4000. The parasitaemia of positive samples (n=180) ranged from 0.04% to 25.5%, with those (19/180) showing gametocytes having lower parasitaemia levels (mean 0.31%, median 0.2%) compared to those that did not (mean 2.59%, median 0.8%). There was a reasonable association (R2=0.60) between parasitaemia level and CD4000 reticulocyte percentages, although there was overall a small statistical bias towards higher parasitaemia estimates determined microscopically. Consistently high immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF) values of >0.5 were observed in cases with a parasitaemia exceeding 5%, while samples with lower parasitaemia levels showed more variable IRF values. Visual examination of CD4000 reticulocyte histograms revealed that 81/100 malaria-positive samples with an IRF above 0.5 showed the presence of a fluorescent population 'spike' consistent with the staining of intracellular malaria parasites. Only three of the 80 malaria-positive samples with an IRF below 0.5, and none of the 237 malaria-negative samples, showed this histogram pattern. These observations indicate that samples with malaria parasites give erroneously high CD4000 reticulocyte estimates that essentially comprise the sum total of true reticulocytes and parasite-infected red cells (pseudo-reticulocytes). This limitation is common to all automated reticulocyte procedures but recognizing the differences between homogenous staining parasitized red cells and heterogeneous staining reticulocytes has potential applications in monitoring parasitaemia levels both at patient presentation and during subsequent treatment.