PubMed · 11554379
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
2001. Staff development.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11554379/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Medical education programs have emphasized the acquisition of basic scientific knowledge and practical skills in well-defined subject areas using lecture and role modeling as the principle means of instruction. The need to address changes in the practice environment, the recognition that alternative instructional models may be desirable in some cases, and the fact that instruction in the traditional subject areas does not prepare students for all aspects of medical practice have driven recent curricular changes at many schools. Indiana University School of Medicine, with multiple instructional sites distributed throughout the state, has adopted a school-wide plan that specifies desired educational outcomes and provides an instrument for rating student achievement. In this report we describe the implementation of new media and pedagogical methods in a two-semester medical pharmacology course with the goal of fostering and assessing competency in the nine areas outlined in this educational plan. The general conclusion is that these changes not only furthered the broader educational goals of the competency-based curriculum, but also may exert a positive influence on student learning of discipline-specific material.
This paper makes recommendations for the improvement of assessment in postgraduate dental education. The recommendations are based on a twelve-month study conducted in 1998/99 which evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of the existing assessment systems. Evidence was taken from examination syllabi, assessments and records. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with representatives from national bodies and with trainers and trainees in the West Midlands. Strengths in parts of the system include: commitment and professional experience; commissioned work; opportunity to share experience; a monitoring framework; procedures for maintaining standards and examples of broadbased assessments. Weaknesses include: lack of assessment of quality; existence of some forms of unregulated assessment; lack of transparency and lack of clarity between training and assessment. Development is recommended in three broad areas: a competence-based model of assessment; distinguishing assessment from the analysis of educational needs and quality assurance. The introduction of a competence-based model is the most significant and is addressed in some detail. Specific proposals for consideration by national regulatory bodies and education providers include: strengthening the management of assessment; national leadership in the development of a competence model of assessment; widening the assessment base; clearer criteria for inspection; revisions to how vocational training, HO/SHO training and general professional training are assessed and training for trainers.