Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11532281

Autoantibodies to complement components.

L A Trouw·A Roos·M R Daha
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The complement system is a major component of innate immunity. Under normal conditions the contribution of the complement system is beneficial, but when inappropriately activated it may cause damage to the host and under certain conditions it may even be the target of an autoantibody response. Autoantibodies directed against individual complement components, convertases, complement regulators and complement receptors have been described. The presence of autoantibodies in individuals may be associated with manifestations of disease, but only for some autoantibodies have clear causal relations been described. Autoantibodies against complement components can even be present in healthy individuals, indicating that the development of pathology most likely requires the simultaneous action of multiple processes. Since autoantibodies against complement components may cause depletion of circulating complement levels, leading to a secondary complement deficiency, it is imaginable that this process leads to an increased susceptibility to infections. In the present review, we describe autoantibodies against complement components and their subsequent effects.

Explore related subjects

AutoantibodiesComplement Pathway, AlternativeComplement Pathway, ClassicalHumansModels, ImmunologicalJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L A Trouw, A Roos, M R Daha. 2001. Autoantibodies to complement components.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-5890(01)00043-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2022

Integration of Infant Metabolite, Genetic, and Islet Autoimmunity Signatures to Predict Type 1 Diabetes by Age 6 Years.

CONTEXT: Biomarkers that can accurately predict risk of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in genetically predisposed children can facilitate interventions to delay or prevent the disease. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to determine if a combination of genetic, immunologic, and metabolic features, measured at infancy, can be used to predict the likelihood that a child will develop T1D by age 6 years. METHODS: Newborns with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing were enrolled in the prospective birth cohort of The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY). TEDDY ascertained children in Finland, Germany, Sweden, and the United States. TEDDY children were either from the general population or from families with T1D with an HLA genotype associated with T1D specific to TEDDY eligibility criteria. From the TEDDY cohort there were 702 children will all data sources measured at ages 3, 6, and 9 months, 11.4% of whom progressed to T1D by age 6 years. The main outcome measure was a diagnosis of T1D as diagnosed by American Diabetes Association criteria. RESULTS: Machine learning-based feature selection yielded classifiers based on disparate demographic, immunologic, genetic, and metabolite features. The accuracy of the model using all available data evaluated by the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve is 0.84. Reducing to only 3- and 9-month measurements did not reduce the area under the curve significantly. Metabolomics had the largest value when evaluating the accuracy at a low false-positive rate. CONCLUSION: The metabolite features identified as important for progression to T1D by age 6 years point to altered sugar metabolism in infancy. Integrating this information with classic risk factors improves prediction of the progression to T1D in early childhood.

Autoantibodies↗
PubMed2022

Heterogeneity of Acetylcholine Receptor Autoantibody-Mediated Complement Activity in Patients With Myasthenia Gravis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Autoantibodies targeting the acetylcholine receptor (AChR), found in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), mediate pathology through 3 mechanisms: complement-directed tissue damage, blocking of the acetylcholine binding site, and internalization of the AChR. Clinical assays, used to diagnose and monitor patients, measure only autoantibody binding. Consequently, they are limited in providing association with disease burden, understanding of mechanistic heterogeneity, and monitoring therapeutic response. The objective of this study was to develop a cell-based assay that measures AChR autoantibody-mediated complement membrane attack complex (MAC) formation. METHODS: An HEK293T cell line-modified using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to disrupt expression of the complement regulator genes (CD46, CD55, and CD59)-was used to measure AChR autoantibody-mediated MAC formation through flow cytometry. RESULTS: Serum samples (n = 155) from 96 clinically confirmed AChR MG patients, representing a wide range of disease burden and autoantibody titer, were tested along with 32 healthy donor (HD) samples. AChR autoantibodies were detected in 139 of the 155 (89.7%) MG samples through a cell-based assay. Of the 139 AChR-positive samples, autoantibody-mediated MAC formation was detected in 83 (59.7%), whereas MAC formation was undetectable in the HD group or AChR-positive samples with low autoantibody levels. MAC formation was positively associated with autoantibody binding in most patient samples; ratios (mean fluorescence intensity) of MAC formation to AChR autoantibody binding ranged between 0.27 and 48, with a median of 0.79 and an interquartile range of 0.43 (0.58-1.1). However, the distribution of ratios was asymmetric and included extreme values; 16 samples were beyond the 10-90 percentile, with high MAC to low AChR autoantibody binding ratio or the reverse. Correlation between MAC formation and clinical disease scores suggested a modest positive association (rho = 0.34, p = 0.0023), which included a subset of outliers that did not follow this pattern. MAC formation did not associate with exposure to immunotherapy, thymectomy, or MG subtypes defined by age-of-onset. DISCUSSION: A novel assay for evaluating AChR autoantibody-mediated complement activity was developed. A subset of patients that lacks association between MAC formation and autoantibody binding or disease burden was identified. The assay may provide a better understanding of the heterogeneous autoantibody molecular pathology and identify patients expected to benefit from complement inhibitor therapy.

Autoantibodies↗
PubMed2002

Autoantibody detection in type 2 autoimmune hepatitis using a chimera recombinant protein.

Autoantibodies against cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6), known as anti-liver/kidney microsome type 1 (LKM1) and/or anti-human formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase, formally known as anti-liver cytosol type 1 (LC1) define type 2 autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). The aims of this work are to develop a sensitive and specific test to detect anti-LKM1 and/or anti-LC1 autoantibodies and to establish the prevalence of anti-LC1. Sera from children with type 2 AIH (n=48) and those from a control group (n=100) were evaluated for anti-LKM1 and anti-LC1 by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and Western blotting. Each serum sample was assayed for reactivity against formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase and CYP2D6 alone or as part of a recombinant chimera protein. By ELISA with recombinant chimera protein, 50 serum samples were positive, 48 from patients with type 2 AIH and 2 from patients with chronic hepatitis C. Twenty-five of 48 (52%) patients studied were positive for both CYP2D6 and LC1 autoantibodies. Anti-LC1, either as the only marker or associated with anti-LKM1, was positive in 34/48 (71%). By Western blotting, anti-LC1 was found in 27/48 (56%) patients. This ELISA technique has proven to be antigen-specific and more sensitive than Western blot for the detection of anti-LC1 and anti-LKM1 autoantibodies. The prevalence of anti-LC1 (71%) confirms it as an important immunomarker in type 2 AIH.

Autoantibodies↗