Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1150601

Safety evaluation concepts.

Abstract

The approach to safety evaluation is strongly influenced by the standard of safety to which one aspires. Practical considerations demand that realistic limits be set to the attainable assurances of freedom from anticipated hazard under actual conditions of use of a product. The fact is that, in the interests of consumer health, more can be expected from a flexible, intelligent, and experienced approach to safety evaluation than from efforts at conformity with a set of rigidly standardized requirements that are theoretically all-encompassing. Establishment of safety demands a wide background of information about the properties and likely uses of the product; above all, knowledge of the chemical composition of the product and its impurities, degradation products, and metabolites is essential. Lack of such information is a frequent source of errors in safety evaluation. Based on a secure foundation of this sort, a program of investigations may be designed, aimed at establishing the basic biological properties of the material. Determination of the metabolic dynamics of the principal chemical agent or agents makes possible the emergence of a clear picture of the behavior of the compound(s) in the body and paves the way for more specialized studies of long term toxicity, carcinogenicity, effects on reproduction and teratogenesis, and investigations of multitest mutagenic potential. Emphasis is laid on the problems of interpretation of results in terms of hazard to man and on the crucial contribution that experience of human exposure can make toward assuring safety-in-use. Decisions on acceptable risk are the joint responsibility of many individuals but an essential element in reaching such decisions is contributed by the depth of understanding and broad experiences of the toxicologist.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Golberg. 1975. Safety evaluation concepts.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1150601/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Corporate financial decision-makers' perceptions of workplace safety.

This study, through a random national survey, explored how senior financial executives or managers (those who determined high-level budget, resource allocation, and corporate priorities) of medium-to-large companies perceive important workplace safety issues. The three top-rated safety priorities in resource allocation reported by the participants (overexertion, repetitive motion, and bodily reaction) were consistent with the top three perceived causes of workers' compensation losses. The greatest single safety concerns reported were overexertion, repetitive motion, highway accidents, falling on the same level and bodily reaction. A majority of participants believed that the indirect costs associated with workplace injury were higher than the direct costs. Our participants believed that money spent improving workplace safety would have significant returns. The perceived top benefits of an effective workplace safety program were increased productivity, reduced cost, retention, and increased satisfaction among employees. The perceived most important safety modification was safety training. The top reasons senior financial executives gave for believing their safety programs were better than those at other companies were that their companies paid more attention to and emphasized safety, they had better classes and training focused on safety, and they had teams/individuals focused specifically on safety.

Accident Prevention↗