Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11442702

Developing an evidence base for interdisciplinary learning: a systematic review.

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY: The overall aim of the study was to explore the feasibility of introducing interdisciplinary education within undergraduate health professional programmes. This paper reports on the first stage of the study in which a systematic review was conducted to summarize the evidence for interdisciplinary education of undergraduate health professional students. METHODS: Systematic reviews integrate valid information providing a basis for rational decision making about health care which should be based on empirical and not anecdotal evidence. The accepted principles for systematic reviews were adapted in order to allow integration of the literature to produce recommendations for educational practice and guidelines for future research. FINDINGS: The literature on interdisciplinary education was found to be diverse, including relatively small amounts of research data and much larger amounts of evaluation literature. Methodological rating schemes were used to test for confounding influences in the research studies. The number of studies found was 141 but only 30 (21%) were included in the analysis because of lack of methodological rigour in the research and poorly developed outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Student health professionals were found to benefit from interdisciplinary education with outcome effects primarily relating to changes in knowledge, skills, attitudes and beliefs. Effects upon professional practice were not discernible and educational and psychological theories were rarely used to guide the development of the educational interventions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Cooper, C Carlisle, T Gibbs, C Watkins. 2001. Developing an evidence base for interdisciplinary learning: a systematic review.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01840.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Integrating midlevel practitioners into a teaching service.

Meeting the educational needs and requirements of surgical resident physicians while achieving optimal patient care is a challenge for program directors. Midlevel practitioners (MLPs) were employed by a large community teaching hospital to augment the surgical teaching service, to improve continuity of patient care, and to provide resident physicians with greater flexibility to participate in classroom, operative, and clinical educational experiences. The MLPs were carefully integrated into the surgical program by creating the necessary buy-in, developing positive relationships, decreasing resistance, and reinforcing acceptance when demonstrated. MLPs function at the level of junior resident physicians and are active participants in the teaching and evaluation process. Structurally, MLPs receive their assignments from and report to the chief resident physician, but are ultimately responsible to the program director. Instituting the program required providing financial justification to administration and flexibility in meeting the diverse needs of the four teams. As a result, surgical resident physicians have been sufficiently freed from service activities to be able to capitalize on learning activities that range from surgeries to conferences. MLPs can be integrated into a surgical teaching program and become a positive force in the education of resident physicians.

Education, Professional↗