Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11426687

Membrane fusion.

Abstract

The fusion of biological membranes results in two bilayer-based membranes merging into a single membrane. In this process the lipids have to undergo considerable rearrangement. The nature of the intermediates that are formed during this rearrangement has been investigated. Certain fusion proteins facilitate this process. In many cases short segments of these fusion proteins have a particularly important role in accelerating the fusion process. Studies of the interaction of model peptides with membranes have allowed for increased understanding at the molecular level of the mechanism of the promotion of membrane fusion by fusion proteins. There is an increased appreciation of the roles of several independent segments of fusion proteins in promoting the fusion process. Many of the studies of the fusion of biological membranes have been done with the fusion of enveloped viruses with other membranes. One reason for this is that the number of proteins involved in viral fusion is relatively simple, often requiring only a single protein. For many enveloped viruses, the structure of their fusion proteins has certain common elements, suggesting that they all promote fusion by an analogous mechanism. Some aspects of this mechanism also appears to be common to intracellular fusion, although several proteins are involved in that process which is more complex and regulated than is viral fusion.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R M Epand. 2000. Membrane fusion.. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1010498618600

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A critical evaluation of the conformational requirements of fusogenic peptides in membranes.

It is generally assumed that fusogenic peptides would require a certain conformation, which triggers or participates in the rate-determining step of membrane fusion. Previous structure analyses of the viral fusion peptide from gp41 of HIV-1 have yielded contradictory results, showing either an alpha-helical or a beta-stranded conformation under different conditions. To find out whether either of these conformations is relevant in the actual fusion process, we have placed sterically demanding substitutions into the fusion peptide FP23 to prevent or partially inhibit folding and self-assembly. A single substitution of either D- or L-CF(3)-phenylglycine was introduced in different positions of the sequence, and the capability of these peptide analogues to fuse large unilamellar vesicles was monitored by lipid mixing and dynamic light scattering. If fusion proceeds via a beta-stranded oligomer, then the D- and L-epimers are expected to differ systematically in their activity, since the D-epimers should be unable to form beta-structures due to sterical hindrance. If an alpha-helical conformation is relevant for fusion, then the D-epimers would be slightly disfavoured compared to the L-forms, hence a small systematic difference in fusion activity should be observed. Interestingly, we find that (1) all D- and L-epimers are fusogenically active, though to different extents compared to the wild type, and--most importantly--(ii) there is no systematic preference for either the D- or L-forms. We therefore suggest that a well-structured alpha-helical peptide conformation or a beta-stranded oligomeric assembly can be excluded as the rate-determining state. Instead, fusion appears to involve conformationally disordered peptides with a pronounced structural plasticity.

Membrane Fusion↗

The structural basis of paramyxovirus invasion.

To deliver their genetic material into host cells, enveloped viruses have surface glycoproteins that actively cause the fusion of the viral and cellular membranes. Recently determined X-ray crystal structures of the paramyxovirus fusion (F) protein in its pre-fusion and post-fusion conformations reveal the dramatic structural transformation that this protein undergoes while causing membrane fusion. Conformational changes in key regions of the F protein suggest the mechanism by which the F protein is activated and refolds.

Membrane Fusion↗

Purification of active HOPS complex reveals its affinities for phosphoinositides and the SNARE Vam7p.

Coupling of Rab GTPase activation and SNARE complex assembly during membrane fusion is poorly understood. The homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting (HOPS) complex links these two processes: it is an effector for the vacuolar Rab GTPase Ypt7p and is required for vacuolar SNARE complex assembly. We now report that pure, active HOPS complex binds phosphoinositides and the PX domain of the vacuolar SNARE protein Vam7p. These binding interactions support HOPS complex association with the vacuole and explain its enrichment at the same microdomains on docked vacuoles as phosphoinositides, Ypt7p, Vam7p, and the other SNARE proteins. Concentration of the HOPS complex at these microdomains may be a key factor for coupling Rab GTPase activation to SNARE complex assembly.

Membrane Fusion↗