Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11414360

Targeting complement in therapy.

Abstract

With increasing evidence that complement activation significantly contributes to the pathogenesis of a large number of inflammatory diseases, strategies that interfere with its deleterious action have become a major focus in pharmacological research. Endogenous soluble complement inhibitors (C1 inhibitor, recombinant soluble complement receptor 1, antibodies) blocking key proteins of the cascade reaction, neutralizing the action of the complement-derived anaphylatoxin C5a, or interfering with complement receptor 3 (CR3, CD18/11b)-mediated adhesion of inflammatory cells to the vascular endothelium have successfully been tested in various animal models over the past years. Promising results consequently led to clinical trials. Furthermore, incorporation of membrane-bound complement regulators (decay-accelerating factor (CD55), membrane co-factor protein (CD46), CD59) in transgenic animals has provided a major step forward in protecting xenografts from hyperacute rejection. At the same time, the poor contribution of complement to the antitumor response, which is caused by multiple resistance mechanisms that hamper the efficacy of antibody-based tumor therapy, is increasingly recognized and requires pharmacologic intervention. First attempts have now been made to interfere with the resistance mechanisms, thereby improving complement-mediated tumor cell destruction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Kirschfink. 2001. Targeting complement in therapy.. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-065x.2001.1800116.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Application of C1-esterase inhibitor during reperfusion of ischemic myocardium: dose-related beneficial versus detrimental effects.

BACKGROUND: Complement activation during reperfusion of ischemic myocardium augments myocardial injury, and complement inhibition with C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) at the time of reperfusion exerts marked cardioprotective effects in experimental studies. Application of C1-INH in newborns, however, was recently reported to have dangerous and even lethal side effects. This study addresses the essential role of dosage in studies using C1-INH. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardioprotection by C1-INH was examined in a pig model with 60 minutes of coronary occlusion followed by 120 minutes of reperfusion. C1-INH was administered intravenously 5 to 10 minutes before coronary reperfusion without heparin at a dose of 40, 100, and 200 IU/kg body wt. Compared with the NaCl controls, C1-INH 40 IU/kg reduced myocardial injury (44.1+/-13.8% versus 76.7+/-4.6% necrosis of area at risk, P</=0.05) and significantly suppressed local C3a and C5a generation. Myocardial protection was accompanied by reduced plasma concentrations of creatine kinase and troponin T. In contrast, no beneficial effects were observed when 100 IU/kg C1-INH was used. Furthermore, application of 200 IU/kg C1-INH provoked severe side effects and coagulation disorders. CONCLUSIONS: When applied at the correct dose, C1-INH significantly protects ischemic tissue from reperfusion damage. However, overly high doses (>/=100 IU/kg) of C1-INH will provoke detrimental side effects, probably via its procoagulatory action.

Anaphylatoxins↗

Removal of mediators by continuous hemofiltration in septic patients.

Continuous hemofiltration currently represents standard renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients. Because higher ultrafiltration rates are related to better survival rates in experimental and clinical studies and hemofiltration results in fewer cardiovascular side effects than does conventional hemodialysis, the use of inflammatory mediator removal by this extracorporeal procedure has emerged. This article reviews clinically relevant principles of compound transport and the experimental and clinical effects of hemofiltration during sepsis. Hemofiltration did not have a major impact on plasma concentrations of prominent inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-a and interleukins 1b, 6, and 8) and seems therefore not to be able to counterbalance endogenous cytokine production despite considerable cytokine removal in the filtrate. Contradictory results in the literature are discussed under the viewpoint of membrane-related sieving coefficients and plasma cytokine measurement. A significant reduction in plasma anaphylatoxin concentrations by hemofiltration is associated with impressive immunomodulatory and cardiodepressive ultrafiltrate effects. Thus far, however, the use of hemofiltration for nonrenal indications remains experimental and is not supported by controlled clinical trials. Modern strategies of blood purification that may be associated with a high degree of effectiveness for mediator removal (high-volume hemofiltration and heparin-induced extracorporeal lipoprotein-fibrinogen precipitation) are discussed.

Anaphylatoxins↗

Complement anaphylatoxin C3a is selectively protective against NMDA-induced neuronal cell death.

The anaphylatoxin C3a is a potent inflammatory polypeptide released at sites of complement activation. To test whether C3a might alter neuronal outcome following an ischemic insult, we determined the effects of purified human C3a on murine primary cortical cell cultures exposed to apoptotic or excitotoxic paradigms. C3a prevented neither serum deprivation-induced apoptotic neuronal death, nor AMPA/kainate-mediated excitotoxicity. However, in mixed cultures of neurons and astrocytes, C3a dose-dependently protected neurons against NMDA toxicity (47% neuroprotection using 100 nM C3a, p < 0.01, n = 12). The neuroprotective effect of C3a was observable only in the presence of astrocytes. These observations suggest that C3a is involved in excitotoxicity-mediated neuronal death through astrocyte stimulation and extend its role beyond immune functions.

Anaphylatoxins↗