Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11398608

Split-course radiotherapy: where do we stand?

H H Dubben·A Krüll·H P Beck-Bornholdt
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Split-course radiotherapy is only rarely applied in curative radiotherapy and there might be a number of arguments to believe that continuous radiotherapy is superior to split-course treatment. In order to point out the evidence current treatment practice is based on, the available randomized trials and some prominent retrospective analyses on split-course radiotherapy were critically assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis of the clinical results was based on published data only. Publications were searched in a Medline database. RESULTS: Assessment of 13 randomized trials, including the data of 2,112 patients, revealed no significant difference between continuous-course and split-course radiotherapy. Astonishingly, the outcome of 77 radiotherapy studies on split-course, most of which are retrospective, seems to depend on the year of publication, suggesting publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: No clinically relevant difference between continuous and split-course radiotherapy could be found. This, of course, does not proof that there are indeed no differences but the data do not allow to draw clear-cut conclusions in favor of or against split-course radiotherapy due to methodological shortcomings of the studies.

Explore related subjects

Dose Fractionation, RadiationEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMEDLINENeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeComparative StudyJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H H Dubben, A Krüll, H P Beck-Bornholdt. 2001. Split-course radiotherapy: where do we stand?. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00002402

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Variability of bladder filling in patients receiving radical radiotherapy to the prostate.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients receiving radical radiotherapy to the prostate are requested to maintain a full bladder to displace the dome of the bladder and small bowel from the target volume. This study investigated patients' ability to consistently maintain a full bladder throughout planning and treatment before (Study 1) and after (Study 2) the introduction of a patient information sheet. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Bladder volumes were measured on 41 patients at CT scanning, simulation and once weekly during treatment using a portable ultrasound device, BladderScan BVI 3000. Patients were asked their assessment of bladder fullness, time since last urination and the volume of fluid drank. A patient information sheet on bladder filling was then introduced and the study repeated on 25 patients (Study 2). The ultrasound bladder volumes measured at CT were compared to the CT scan data. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the ultrasound and CT bladder volumes r = 0.88 (P < 0.01). There was a significant decrease between the volume at CT (mean 362 ml, SD 229 ml) and treatment (mean 251 ml, SD 171 ml) in Study 1 (P = 0.002). In Study 2 the mean volume at CT was 286 ml (SD 164 ml) compared to a mean of 312 ml (SD 196 ml) during treatment. The measured volume correlated with patient self-assessment (r = 0.47, P < 0.01). The median volume drank by patients in Study 2 was 350 ml (range 50-825 ml) compared to 450 ml (range 75-1500 ml) in Study 1. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial results showed patients were unable to maintain a constant bladder volume during planning and treatment. Implementation of written bladder filling instructions was shown to improve bladder volume consistency.

Dose Fractionation, Radiation↗
PubMed2006

Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated, conformal, and four-field pelvic radiotherapy boost plans for gynecologic cancer: a retrospective planning study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) as an alternative to conformal radiotherapy (CRT) or 4-field box boost (4FB) in women with gynecologic malignancies who are unsuitable for brachytherapy for technical or medical reasons. METHODS: Dosimetric and toxicity information was analyzed for 12 patients with cervical (8), endometrial (2) or vaginal (2) cancer previously treated with external beam pelvic radiotherapy and a CRT boost. Optimized IMRT boost treatment plans were then developed for each of the 12 patients and compared to CRT and 4FB plans. The plans were compared in terms of dose conformality and critical normal tissue avoidance. RESULTS: The median planning target volume (PTV) was 151 cm(3) (range 58-512 cm(3)). The median overlap of the contoured rectum with the PTV was 15 (1-56) %, and 11 (4-35) % for the bladder. Two of the 12 patients, both with large PTVs and large overlap of the contoured rectum and PTV, developed grade 3 rectal bleeding. The dose conformity was significantly improved with IMRT over CRT and 4FB (p < or = 0.001 for both). IMRT also yielded an overall improvement in the rectal and bladder dose-volume distributions relative to CRT and 4FB. The volume of rectum that received the highest doses (>66% of the prescription) was reduced by 22% (p < 0.001) with IMRT relative to 4FB, and the bladder volume was reduced by 19% (p < 0.001). This was at the expense of an increase in the volume of these organs receiving doses in the lowest range (<33%). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that IMRT can improve target coverage and reduce dose to critical structures in gynecologic patients receiving an external beam radiotherapy boost. This dosimetric advantage will be integrated with other patient and treatment-specific factors, particularly internal tumor movement during fractionated radiotherapy, in the context of a future image-guided radiation therapy study.

Dose Fractionation, Radiation↗
PubMed2006

Defining the radiation target on a daily basis.

The delineation of the target volume for irradiation is a critical step in the radiotherapy process. Delivery of radiotherapy occurs over a fractionated course of many treatments. Variations in the position of the target volume may occur on a daily basis during treatment and so the procedure for defining the target volume on a single initial 'snapshot' computed tomography scan has been re-evaluated. Newer technologies of image-guided radiotherapy allow the development of on-line daily definition of the target volume prior to radiotherapy delivery.

Dose Fractionation, Radiation↗