Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11395436

MAPS: a microarray project system for gene expression experiment information and data validation.

P R Bushel·H Hamadeh·L Bennett·S Sieber·K Martin·E F Nuwaysir·K Johnson·K Reynolds·R S Paules·C A Afshari
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

SUMMARY: MAPS is a MicroArray Project System for management and interpretation of microarray gene expression experiment information and data. Microarray project information is organized to track experiments and results that are: (1) validated by performing analysis on stored replicate gene expression data; and (2) queried according to the biological classifications of genes deposited on microarray chips.

Explore related subjects

Computer Communication NetworksData DisplayDatabase Management SystemsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProgramming LanguagesJournal ArticleValidation Study

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P R Bushel, H Hamadeh, L Bennett, S Sieber, K Martin, E F Nuwaysir, K Johnson, K Reynolds, R S Paules, C A Afshari. 2001. MAPS: a microarray project system for gene expression experiment information and data validation.. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics%2F17.6.564

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Case-oriented computer-based-training in radiology: concept, implementation and evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Providing high-quality clinical cases is important for teaching radiology. We developed, implemented and evaluated a program for a university hospital to support this task. METHODS: The system was built with Intranet technology and connected to the Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS). It contains cases for every user group from students to attendants and is structured according to the ACR-code (American College of Radiology) 2. Each department member was given an individual account, could gather his teaching cases and put the completed cases into the common database. RESULTS: During 18 months 583 cases containing 4136 images involving all radiological techniques were compiled and 350 cases put into the common case repository. Workflow integration as well as individual interest influenced the personal efforts to participate but an increasing number of cases and minor modifications of the program improved user acceptance continuously. 101 students went through an evaluation which showed a high level of acceptance and a special interest in elaborate documentation. CONCLUSION: Electronic access to reference cases for all department members anytime anywhere is feasible. Critical success factors are workflow integration, reliability, efficient retrieval strategies and incentives for case authoring.

Computer Communication Networks↗