Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11304739

Two-phase shelf-life estimation.

Abstract

Unlike most drug products, some drug products must be stored at several temperatures, such as -20 degrees C, 5 degrees C and 25 degrees C, in order to maintain the stability of the drug products. Drug products of this kind are usually referred to as frozen drug products. The determination of shelf-life for frozen drug products involves the estimation of drug shelf-lives at different temperatures, which requires multiple phase linear regression. Mellon suggested obtaining a combined shelf-life by determining shelf-lives based on data available at different temperatures. This method, however, does not account for the fact that the shelf-life at the second-phase would depend on the shelf-life at the first phase. As an alternative, we propose a method for determination of drug shelf-lives for the two phases using a two-phase regression analysis based on the statistical principle described in the FDA guideline and the ICH guideline. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the proposed method.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Shao, S C Chow. 2001-04-30. Two-phase shelf-life estimation.. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.783

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

["P" as in Program Package. About torturing data and significant "fishing expeditions"].

For the study of prognostic factors, the medical researchers have access to a number of advanced statistical techniques available in standard program packages. A tradition has developed where survival or time to relapse is analysed on the basis of statistical materials with few patients but a large number of possible explanatory variables. In statistical "fishing expeditions" the p-values are used to sort out potentially useful prognostic variables. Since the number of observations is small, all relevant prognostic factors do not give statistical significance. Since a large number of variables are tested there is a considerable risk for spurious significances. It is not enough to show that a prognostic factor seems to be efficient in the patient group where it was first found. The result must be verified in further studies of independent groups of similar patients.

Confidence Intervals↗

Substance abuse and the need for money management assistance among psychiatric inpatients.

Patients who mismanage their funds may benefit from financial advice, case management or the involuntary assignment of a payee who restricts direct access to funds. Data from a survey of psychiatric inpatients at four VA hospitals (N = 236) was used to evaluate the relationship between substance abuse and clinician-rated need for money management assistance. Multivariate analytic techniques were used to control for sociodemographic factors and psychopathology. Alcohol and drug use severity both were modestly associated with need for assistance. The effect of substance use severity was greater in patients who were also diagnosed with a major mental illness. Clinicians indicated that 27 patients (11% of the sample) required an involuntary payee and 21 of the 27 (78%) had a Substance Abuse diagnosis. Only drug use severity was significantly associated with need for a payee. These data describe a substantial unmet need for money management assistance in psychiatric inpatients, particularly among those with substance abuse disorders. There is a need to examine the process by which the Social Security and Veterans Benefits Administrations assign payees to determine whether patients with co-morbid substance abuse are not being assigned a payee in spite of their discernible need for one.

Confidence Intervals↗

Low agreement among 24 doctors using the Neer-classification; only moderate agreement on displacement, even between specialists.

Twenty-four orthopaedic surgeons classified 42 pairs of radiographs according to the Neer system for proximal humeral fractures. Mean kappa value for inter-observer agreement was 0.27 (95% CI 0.26-0.28) with no clinically significant difference between orthopaedic residents ( n=9), fellows ( n=6) and specialists ( n=9). Mean kappa for agreement of displacement versus non-displacement was 0.41 (95% CI 0.39-0.43) overall, and 0.50 (95% CI 0.45-0.56) within the specialist group. The agreement found in our study is unsatisfactory from a clinical perspective.

Confidence Intervals↗