Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11301078

Infant direction discrimination thresholds.

Abstract

Although adults can detect direction differences as small as 1 arc degree, the ability of infants to discriminate direction of motion is less clear. This study measures the precision with which 6-, 12-, and 18-week-old infants discriminate direction of motion. Infants viewed random dot kinematograms in which a direction difference between the target and background dots defined a circular target. The target was then placed into continuous motion. An FPL paradigm was used to assess infants' preference for the target as a function of the direction difference between the target and background dots. Direction discrimination thresholds with a moving target were indeterminate at 6 weeks of age, 22 degrees at 12 weeks of age and 17 degrees at 18 weeks of age. This precision was maintained across different testing conditions. However, performance dropped markedly when dot motion was presented within a flickering stationary target. It was concluded that infants can make relatively fine discriminations of motion direction if given an engaging stimulus.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Banton, K Dobkins, B I Bertenthal. 2001. Infant direction discrimination thresholds.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00027-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Computerized adaptive testing for measuring development of young children.

Developmental indicators that are used for routine measurement in The Netherlands are usually chosen to optimally identify delayed children. Measurements on the majority of children without problems are therefore quite imprecise. This study explores the use of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to monitor the development of young children. CAT is expected to improve the measurement precision of the instrument. We do two simulation studies - one with real data and one with simulated data - to evaluate the usefulness of CAT. It is shown that CAT selects developmental indicators that maximally match the individual child, so that all children can be measured to the same precision.

Child Development↗

Child development: risk factors for adverse outcomes in developing countries.

Poverty and associated health, nutrition, and social factors prevent at least 200 million children in developing countries from attaining their developmental potential. We review the evidence linking compromised development with modifiable biological and psychosocial risks encountered by children from birth to 5 years of age. We identify four key risk factors where the need for intervention is urgent: stunting, inadequate cognitive stimulation, iodine deficiency, and iron deficiency anaemia. The evidence is also sufficient to warrant interventions for malaria, intrauterine growth restriction, maternal depression, exposure to violence, and exposure to heavy metals. We discuss the research needed to clarify the effect of other potential risk factors on child development. The prevalence of the risk factors and their effect on development and human potential are substantial. Furthermore, risks often occur together or cumulatively, with concomitant increased adverse effects on the development of the world's poorest children.

Child Development↗