Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11269159

[Atopic dermatitis].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Nakamura, K Tamaki. 2000. [Atopic dermatitis].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11269159/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effect of combining salmeterol and fluticasone on the progression of airway remodeling.

In subjects insufficiently controlled with low to moderate doses of inhaled corticosteroids, adding beta-agonists is clinically more beneficial than increasing the dose of inhaled corticosteroids. In the present study, we investigated the effect of adding salmeterol to fluticasone on allergen-induced airway inflammation and remodeling. Sensitized rats, in which characteristics of remodeling had been induced by ovalbumin exposure every 2 days from Days 14 to 28, were further exposed to ovalbumin or PBS from Days 29 to 42. During the last 2 weeks, before allergen exposure, rats were treated with aerosolized fluticasone propionate (10 mg), salmeterol (1 mg), salmeterol (1 mg) plus fluticasone propionate (10 mg), or placebo. After 4 weeks of ovalbumin exposure, the airways showed inflammatory changes, goblet cell hyperplasia, and enhanced fibronectin and collagen deposition. Salmeterol in monotherapy decreased bronchoalveolar lavage fluid eosinophil number but had no influence on structural changes. Combining salmeterol with fluticasone propionate counteracted goblet cell hyperplasia, but increased the amount of fibronectin and collagen in the airway wall. These effects of salmeterol did not influence airway responsiveness. We conclude that the combination of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate enhances aspects of allergen-induced airway remodeling. This is not accompanied by changes in airway responsiveness.

Administration, Topical↗

Randomized controlled economic evaluation of asthma self-management in primary health care.

In this randomized controlled economic evaluation we compared guided asthma self-management with usual asthma care according to guidelines for Dutch family physicians. Nineteen family practices were randomized, and 193 adults with stable asthma (98 self-management, 95 usual care) were included and monitored for 2 years. We hypothesized that introducing self-management would not compromise asthma control and cost would be equal to or lower than in usual care. Patient-specific cost data were collected, preference-based utilities were assessed, and incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and successfully treated week gained was calculated. Self-management patients gained 0.039 QALY (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.003 to 0.075) and experienced 81 (95% CI, 78 to 84) successfully treated weeks in 2 years' time; the corresponding figures for usual care were 0.024 (95% CI, -0.022 to 0.071) and 75 (95% CI, 72 to 78). Total costs were 1,084 euros(95% CI, 938 to 1,228) for self-management and 1,097 euros (95% CI, 933 to 1,260) for usual care. Self-management patients consumed 1,680 (95% CI, 1,538 to 1,822) puffs of budesonide, usual care patients 1,897 (95% CI, 1,679 to 2,115). Mean productivity cost due to limited activity days was 213 euros lower among self-management patients. When all costs were included, self-management was cost-effective on all outcomes. The probability that self-management was cost-effective relative to usual care in terms of QALYs was 52%. We conclude that guided self-management is a safe and efficient alternative approach compared with asthma treatment usually provided in Dutch primary care.

Administration, Topical↗