Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 112681

Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Abstract

The limitations of diagnostic "accuracy" as a measure of decision performance require introduction of the concepts of the "sensitivity" and "specificity" of a diagnostic test. These measures and the related indices, "true positive fraction" and "false positive fraction," are more meaningful than "accuracy," yet do not provide a unique description of diagnostic performance because they depend on the arbitrary selection of a decision threshold. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is shown to be a simple yet complete empirical description of this decision threshold effect, indicating all possible combinations of the relative frequencies of the various kinds of correct and incorrect decisions. Practical experimental techniques for measuring ROC curves are described, and the issues of case selection and curve-fitting are discussed briefly. Possible generalizations of conventional ROC analysis to account for decision performance in complex diagnostic tasks are indicated. ROC analysis is shown to be related in a direct and natural way to cost/benefit analysis of diagnostic decision making. The concepts of "average diagnostic cost" and "average net benefit" are developed and used to identify the optimal compromise among various kinds of diagnostic error. Finally, the way in which ROC analysis can be employed to optimize diagnostic strategies is suggested.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C E Metz. 1978. Basic principles of ROC analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2998(78)80014-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Multilevel care. A Veterans Administration initiative in health care cost control.

The Veterans Administration's (VA) Department of Medicine and Surgery, the largest of the civilian federal health care systems, is under continuous White House, congressional, and public pressure to provide greater accountability and increased cost-effectiveness for its $5 billion-plus annual budget. Responding to these pressures, the VA is evaluating in ten of its 172 medical centers a new system of resource allocation and financial management known as a multilevel care system. This is a major VA intiative with highly important implications for both the VA and the private health care sector.

Cost-Benefit Analysis