Memory involves far more than 'consolidation'.

R R Miller; L D Matzel

doi:10.1038/35044578

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11257911

Memory involves far more than 'consolidation'.

R R Miller·L D Matzel

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The observation that retrieval returns a stable memory into a labile state cannot be readily explained by any simple version of consolidation theory. This finding has been interpreted as evidence for the need to reconsolidate a memory after reactivating it. However, as we discuss in this commentary, other behavioural observations indicate that even this modification to consolidation theory may be insufficient to describe the dynamic properties of memory.

Explore related subjects

Amnesia Animals Brain Conditioning, Psychological Electroconvulsive Therapy Humans Memory Models, Neurological Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

R R Miller, L D Matzel. 2000. Memory involves far more than 'consolidation'.. https://doi.org/10.1038/35044578

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

Molsidomine attenuates N(omega)-nitro-L-argininemethylester-induced deficits in a memory task in the rat.

The present study was designed to investigate the role of nitric oxide (NO) on recognition memory in the rat. For this purpose, the effects on memory exerted by post-training administration of the NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor N(omega)-nitro-L-argininemethylester (L-NAME) and the NO donor molsidomine were assessed by using the object recognition task. In a first dose-response study, L-NAME, at 30 but not at 10 mg/kg impaired the animals' performance, whereas at 60 mg/kg, it induced side-effects. Molsidomine, 4 mg/kg, antagonized the L-NAME-induced performance deficits. These results indicate that NO is involved in post-training memory processes.

Amnesia↗

PubMed2002

Reactivation and reconsolidation of long-term memory in the crab Chasmagnathus: protein synthesis requirement and mediation by NMDA-type glutamatergic receptors.

Experiments with invertebrates support the view that intracellular events subserving the consolidation phase of memory are preserved across evolution. Here, we investigate whether such evolutionary persistence extends to reconsolidation mechanisms, which have recently received special attention in vertebrate studies. For this purpose, the memory model of the crab Chasmagnathus is used. A visual danger stimulus (VDS) elicits crab escaping, which declines after a few stimulus presentations. The long-lasting retention of this decrement, called context-signal memory (CSM), is mediated by an association between contextual cues of the training site and the VDS. The present results show amnesia for CSM in crabs re-exposed at 24 hr (day 2) for 5 min to the learning context, 24 hr after training, and injected with one of two amnesic agents, then tested 24 hr later. Agents and timing were either 15 microg of cycloheximide given between 1 hr before and 4 hr after re-exposure or 1 microg/gm (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine given between 1 hr before and 2 hr after re-exposure. The amnesic effects are specific to behavior that occurs a long time after reactivation but not a short time after. No CSM deficit is produced by such agents when crabs are exposed to a context different from that of training. Findings are consistent with those reported for vertebrates, with both showing that reactivation induces a recapitulation of the postacquisition cascade of intracellular events. The agreement between results from such phylogenetically disparate animals suggests that evolution may have adopted a given molecular cascade as the preferred means of encoding experiences in the nervous system.

Amnesia↗

PubMed2002

Against memory systems.

The medial temporal lobe is indispensable for normal memory processing in both human and non-human primates, as is shown by the fact that large lesions in it produce a severe impairment in the acquisition of new memories. The widely accepted inference from this observation is that the medial temporal cortex, including the hippocampal, entorhinal and perirhinal cortex, contains a memory system or multiple memory systems, which are specialized for the acquisition and storage of memories. Nevertheless, there are some strong arguments against this idea: medial temporal lesions produce amnesia by disconnecting the entire temporal cortex from neuromodulatory afferents arising in the brainstem and basal forebrain, not by removing cortex; the temporal cortex is essential for perception as well as for memory; and response properties of temporal cortical neurons make it impossible that some kinds of memory trace could be stored in the temporal lobe. All cortex is plastic, and it is possible that the same rules of plasticity apply to all cortical areas; therefore, memory traces are stored in widespread cortical areas rather than in a specialized memory system restricted to the temporal lobe. Among these areas, the prefrontal cortex has an important role in learning and memory, but is best understood as an area with no specialization of function.

Amnesia↗