Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11252258

Fructan 2000.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D R Biggs, K R Hancock. 2001. Fructan 2000.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01796-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Xylanase, beta-glucanase, and other side enzymatic activities have greater effects on the viscosity of several feedstuffs than xylanase and beta-glucanase used alone or in combination.

This study was carried out to evaluate the effects of a pure xylanase, a pure beta-glucanase, a mix of the two pure enzymes, and a commercial enzyme preparation (Quatrazyme HP, Nutri-Tomen Les Ulis, France) on the viscosity exhibited by water-soluble nonstarch polysaccharides of several feedstuffs (Rialto wheat, Sidéral wheat, Isengrain wheat, triticale, rye, barley, oats, corn, wheat bran, rice bran, wheat screenings, soybean meal, rapeseed meal, sunflower meal, and peas). The viscosity depended on the feedstuffs and varieties of the same feedstuff. There was a correlation (R (2) = 0.86) between viscosity of cereals and their arabinoxylan and beta-glucan contents. The correlation was greater (R (2) = 0.99) when the type of cereal was taken into account. The addition of pure xylanase significantly decreased the viscosity of all feedstuffs except sunflower meal (P < or = 0.05). However, pure beta-glucanase was unable significantly to decrease the viscosity of Isengrain wheat, corn, rice bran, wheat screenings, soybean meal, and sunflower meal. There was a greater decrease in viscosity with the combination of xylanase and beta-glucanase than with addition of xylanase or beta-glucanase alone. This synergistic action of xylanase and beta-glucanase was observed only in Rialto wheat, Sidéral wheat, triticale, rye, barley, oats, and peas. Finally, the commercial enzyme preparation produced a greater reduction (P < or = 0.05) in viscosity for all feedstuffs compared to xylanase or beta-glucanase used alone or in combination. The greater effectiveness of the commercial enzyme preparation was due to the presence of side enzymatic activities (arabinofuranosidase, xylosidase, glucosidase, galactosidase, cellulase, and polygalacturonase).

Animal Feed↗

Effects of exogenous inositol hexakisphosphate (InsP(6)) on the levels of InsP(6) and of inositol trisphosphate (InsP(3)) in malignant cells, tissues and biological fluids.

InsP(6) is abundant in cereals and legumes. InsP(6) and lower inositol phosphates, in particular InsP(3), participate in important intracellular processes. In addition, InsP(6) possess significant health benefits, such as anti-cancer effect, kidney stones prevention, lowering serum cholesterol. Because of the insensitivity of existing methods for determination of non-radiolabeled inositol phosphates, little is known about the natural occurrence, much less on the concentrations of InsP(6) and InsP(3) in biological samples. Using gas chromatography-mass detection analysis of HPLC chromatographic fractions, we report a measurement of unlabeled total InsP(3) and InsP(6) (a) as they occur within cells culture, tissues, and plasma, and (b) their changes depending on the presence of exogenous InsP(6). When rats were fed on a purified diet in which InsP(6) was undetectable (AIN-76A) the levels of InsP(6) in brain were 3.35 +/- 0.57 (SE) micromol.kg(-1) and in plasma 0.023 +/- 0.008 (SE) micromol.l(-1). The presence of InsP(6) in diet dramatically influenced its levels in brain and in plasma. When rats were given an InsP(6)-sufficient diet (AIN-76A + 1% InsP(6)), the levels of InsP(6) were about 100-fold higher in brain tissues (36.8 +/- 1.8 (SE)) than in plasma (0.29 +/- 0.02 (SE)); InsP(6) concentrations were 8.5-fold higher than total InsP(3) concentrations in either plasma (0.033 +/- 0.012 (SE)) and brain (4.21 +/- 0.55 (SE)). When animals were given an InsP(6)-poor diet (AIN-76A only), there was a 90% decrease in InsP(6) content in both brain tissue and plasma (p < 0.001); however, there was no change in the level of total InsP(3). In non-stimulated malignant cells (MDA-MB 231 and K562) the InsP(6) contents were 16.2 +/- 9.1 (SE) micromol.kg(-1) for MDA-MB 231 cells and 15.6 +/- 2.7 (SE) for K 562 cells. These values were around 3-fold higher than those of InsP(3) (4.8 +/- 0.5 micromol.kg(-1) and 6.9 +/- 0.1 (SE) for MDA-MB 231 and K562 cells respectively). Treatment of malignant cells with InsP(6) resulted in a 2-fold increase in the intracellular concentrations of total InsP(3) (9.5 +/- 1.3 (SE) and 10.8 +/- 1.0 (SE) micromol.kg(-1) for MDA-MB 231 and K562 cells respectively, p < 0.05), without changes in InsP(6) levels. These results indicate that exogenous InsP(6) directly affects its physiological levels in plasma and brain of normal rats without changes on the total InsP(3) levels. Although a similar fluctuation of InsP(6) concentration was not seen in human malignant cell lines following InsP(6) treatment, an increased intracellular levels of total InsP(3) was clearly observed.

Animal Feed↗