Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11239103

Thinking carefully about outpatient commitment.

Abstract

We are witnessing an unprecedented wave of interest in outpatient commitment. In part, enthusiasm for outpatient commitment stems from concerns about highly publicized acts of violence by persons with mental disorders, although this is one of the weaker justifications for new laws. Provision of involuntary outpatient treatment may be an important component of a system of care for persons with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and other serious mental illnesses for reasons entirely unrelated to the prevention of headline-grabbing acts of violence. The existing data, all imperfect, tend to favor the efficacy of outpatient commitment as a means of stabilizing patients in the community, and many clinicians who have been involved in the process share this view. Acknowledging limitations in the empirical evidence favoring outpatient commitment, the author reviews key issues for policy makers to address in considering or revising these statutes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P S Appelbaum. 2001. Thinking carefully about outpatient commitment.. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.52.3.347

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

['Treatment of drug-addicted detainees': and advisory report by the Health Council of the Netherlands].

The Minister of Health, Welfare and Sport and the Minister of Justice requested advice from the Health Council of the Netherlands, on options for the treatment of detainees addicted to drugs. It is estimated that 15,000 to 23,000 people per year with addiction problems are detained. On the basis of the Custodial Institutions Act detainees have the right to adequate medical, psychological and psychiatric care, including treatment for drug addiction. The legal possibilities for using compulsion in the treatment of addicted persons in detention are very limited. A consensus needs to be reached on methadone medication; professional groups must reach this consensus. As well as abstinence, Addiction Support Sections should aim to achieve harm reduction, for example, by means of stabilisation with a maintenance dose of methadone. The success of interventions among addicted detainees is largely dependent on both the introduction of pressure in the area of follow-up care and the continuity of care. Bearing in mind the frequent psychiatric comorbidity, more psychiatric care should be available within the penitentiary setting. The Penal Care Facility for Addicts [Dutch acronym: SOV] is a new sanction option in the Penal Code with which drug-addicted repeat offenders can be involuntarily admitted to a drug addiction treatment centre for a maximum of 2 years. There is not enough scientific evidence to support the effectiveness of the SOV approach. The compulsory placement of an addict in the SOV could reduce the addict's motivation to do something about his addiction problem. SOV is a harsh sanction that should only be used once lighter sanctions (based on pressure by means of special conditions) have been shown to be ineffective for the persons concerned.

Coercion↗