Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11220414

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Abstract

Over the last 2 decades, enterococci, formerly viewed as organisms of minimal clinical impact, have emerged as important hospital-acquired pathogens in immunosuppressed patients and intensive care units (ICUs). Vancomycin resistance in enterococci is increasing steadily. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) composed 26% of nosocomial enterococci in 1999, a 47% increase from 1994 to 1998. More that 25% of ICU enterococci are resistant to vancomycin. Antimicrobial therapy is problematic for all VRE, but particularly when bactericidal activity is necessary. Quinipristin-dalfopristin and linezolid are 2 new approved antimicrobials for the treatment of recalcitrant infections caused byVRE. Control of the transmission of VRE, although successful in preventing infections, is neither simple nor inexpensive, and VRE has become endemic in many hospitals. However, endemicity poses serious risks to the health of current and future patients, and of itself, is expensive. Data on the cost-effectiveness of VRE prevention programs are currently lacking and urgently needed; however, because the added cost of a single VRE infection far exceeds those of gowns, gloves, and screening, it seems likely that such control programs represent significant cost savings for those hospitals willing to undertake them.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A J McGeer, D E Low. 2000. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci.. https://doi.org/10.1053/srin.2000.20945

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals.

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether lower levels of staffing by nurses at hospitals are associated with an increased risk that patients will have complications or die. METHODS: We used administrative data from 1997 for 799 hospitals in 11 states (covering 5,075,969 discharges of medical patients and 1,104,659 discharges of surgical patients) to examine the relation between the amount of care provided by nurses at the hospital and patients' outcomes. We conducted regression analyses in which we controlled for patients' risk of adverse outcomes, differences in the nursing care needed for each hospital's patients, and other variables. RESULTS: The mean number of hours of nursing care per patient-day was 11.4, of which 7.8 hours were provided by registered nurses, 1.2 hours by licensed practical nurses, and 2.4 hours by nurses' aides. Among medical patients, a higher proportion of hours of care per day provided by registered nurses and a greater absolute number of hours of care per day provided by registered nurses were associated with a shorter length of stay (P=0.01 and P<0.001, respectively) and lower rates of both urinary tract infections (P<0.001 and P=0.003, respectively) and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (P=0.03 and P=0.007, respectively). A higher proportion of hours of care provided by registered nurses was also associated with lower rates of pneumonia (P=0.001), shock or cardiac arrest (P=0.007), and "failure to rescue," which was defined as death from pneumonia, shock or cardiac arrest, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, sepsis, or deep venous thrombosis (P=0.05). Among surgical patients, a higher proportion of care provided by registered nurses was associated with lower rates of urinary tract infections (P=0.04), and a greater number of hours of care per day provided by registered nurses was associated with lower rates of "failure to rescue" (P=0.008). We found no associations between increased levels of staffing by registered nurses and the rate of in-hospital death or between increased staffing by licensed practical nurses or nurses' aides and the rate of adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A higher proportion of hours of nursing care provided by registered nurses and a greater number of hours of care by registered nurses per day are associated with better care for hospitalized patients.

Cross Infection↗

[Etiology of hospital-acquired infections in Spanish hospitals (EPINE, 1990-1999)].

BACKGROUND: Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients, their interaction with pathogens and antimicrobial therapies are prompting changes in the epidemiology of hospital-acquired infections (HI). The knowledge of the etiology of hospital-acquired infections is valuable for the treatment of infected patients and for the prevention of HI. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We analyzed a series of 10 annual prevalence studies during the period 1990-1999 (EPINE project) in Spanish hospitals. Estimate of prevalence of infection was calculated by means of the percent distribution of every organism regarding overall identified organisms and infections. RESULTS: 40,550 HI were identified among 484,013 patients (HI prevalence = 8.4%; 95% CI, 8.3-8.5%). Gram-positive organism predominated steadily in bloodstream and surgical wound infections, while gram-negative bacilli predominated in respiratory and urinary tract infections. There was an increase in HI infections by Acinetobacter baumannii (from 1.9% in 1990 to 3.6% in 1999; P < 0.001) and Candida albicans (from 2.4 to 3.2%; P < 0.001), as well as an increase in both HI and community-acquired infections by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [HI: from 4.7 to 40.2% (P < 0.001); community-acquired: from 2.7 to 15.6% (P < 0.001)]. CONCLUSIONS: We observed some changes in the etiology of infections over the last decade: rates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus hospital-acquired and community-acquired infections increased steadily and their initial rates multiplied by 8 and 6, respectively. Rates of HI caused by yeasts and A. baumannii increased also.

Cross Infection↗