PubMed · 11220260
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
2001. [Intrascalene block].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11220260/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Several donor nerve graft sites commonly are used when repairing segmental defects in sensory nerves distal to the wrist. The cross-sectional area and number of fascicles of donor nerves and specific digital nerve segments were investigated to provide guidelines for selection of nerve graft harvest sites according to defects encountered. Nerve segments were harvested from 10 fresh cadavers (20 upper extremities). Five sites of nerve graft were harvested: lateral and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerves (LABCN, MABCN), posterior and anterior interosseous nerves (PIN, AIN), and sural nerves. Four sites of typical segmental nerve defects were harvested in a zone protocol: common digital nerve (zone 4), proper digital nerve (zone 3), digital nerve distal to main dorsal branch at the metacarpophalangeal joint (zone 2), and digital nerve distal to trifurcation at fingertip (zone 1). Sural nerve is the most anatomically similar nerve graft for defects in zone 4 by cross-sectional area and number of fascicles. Lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve is most appropriate for zone 2 and 3 injuries by both criteria. Fingertip grafts for zone 1 injuries displayed cross-sectional area similarity to PIN, AIN, and MABCN. With regard to number of fascicles, zone 1 digital nerves are most similar to LABCN donors.
Newborns with peripheral nerve lesions involving the upper extremity are difficult to evaluate. The reliability of the Active Movement Scale (AMS), a tool for assessing motor function in infants with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy (OBPP), was examined in 2 complementary studies. Part A was an interrater reliability study in which 63 infants younger than 1 year with OBPP were independently evaluated by 2 physical therapists using the AMS. The scores were compared for reliability and controlled for chance agreement by using kappa statistics. Overall kappa analysis of the 15 tested movements showed a moderate strength of score agreement (kappa = 0.51). Quadratic-weighted kappa (kappa(quad)) statistics showed that 8 of the 15 movements tested were in the highest strength of agreement category (kappa(quad) = 0.81-1.00). Five movements showed substantial agreement (kappa(quad) = 0.61-0.80), and 2 movements had moderate agreement (kappa(quad) = 0.41- 0.60). The overall kappa(quad) was 0.89. Part B was a variability study designed to examine the dispersion of scores when infants with OBPP were evaluated with the AMS by multiple raters. Ten pediatric physical therapists with varying degrees of experience using the scale attended a 1(1/2)-hour instructional workshop on administration of the tool for infants with OBPP. A chain-block study design was used to obtain 30 assessments of 10 infants by 10 raters. A 2-way analysis of variance indicated that the variability of scores due to rater factors was low compared with the variability due to patient factors and that variation in scores due to rater experience was minimal. The results of part A indicate that the AMS is a reliable tool for the assessment of infants with OBPP when raters familiar with the scale are compared. The results of part B suggest that, with minimal training, raters with a range of experience using the AMS are able to reliably evaluate infants with upper-extremity paralysis.