Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11210613

[Does a pelvic compartment exist? Personal experience].

J Michek·P Zelnícek·J Vrastyák·J Kubacák·P Wendsche·J Filipinský·M Sutorý
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The authors analyze a group of 7 patients transferred to their hospital for instable fractures of the pelvic circle and lumbar spine. The pelvic compartment was manifested 24-48 hours after injury. Early diagnostics are based on the use of new imaging techniques, spiral CT examination is preferred, and angiography in stabilized patients. Early surgical intervention is aimed at evacuation of haematomas, revision of vessels, release of the ureters and temporary nephrostomy.

Explore related subjects

Compartment SyndromesFractures, BoneHumansPelvic BonesPelvisEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Michek, P Zelnícek, J Vrastyák, J Kubacák, P Wendsche, J Filipinský, M Sutorý. 2000. [Does a pelvic compartment exist? Personal experience].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11210613/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Anatomic compartments of the foot: a 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging study.

There is neither consensus on the number nor agreement on the location of the anatomic compartments of the foot. This project utilized high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify foot compartments. The purpose of this study was to devise a new system using 3-Tesla (3T) MRI that assessed the number and location of these compartments. Six feet from healthy volunteers were imaged. From these, 10 compartments were described: (1) medial, (2) calcaneal, (3) lateral, (4) central superficial, (5) central deep (adductor), (6-9) interossei, and (10) skin. The 3T MRI and foot/ankle coil allowed us to assess the number and location of foot compartments.

Compartment Syndromes↗
PubMed2007

Treatment of renal transplant complications with a mesh hood fascial closure technique.

Early renal allograft dysfunction may be caused by a number of technical factors including thrombosis, kinking of vessels, and a Page kidney situation in which the allograft is compressed within a shallow false pelvis and limited retroperitoneal space. Without early recognition, compromised graft function, obstruction, or graft loss may ensue. We describe a technique using a polypropylene-assisted mesh hood fascial closure (MHFC) to prevent and treat this potential complication. MHFC was performed both primarily to prevent this phenomenon, and secondarily to treat this complication. Between April 2001 and October 2002, 16 patients undergoing 17 renal transplants underwent MHFC. The mean recipient body weight was 17% less than the mean donor weight. The mean follow-up period was 9 months. The mean serum creatinine level after primary MHFC was 148.4 micromol/L. Three of 4 patients with early allograft dysfunction regained function after secondary MHFC and had a mean serum creatinine level of 155.3 micromol/L. Wound complications were seen in 5 (31%) patients with no wound or mesh infections and 1 patient was diagnosed with a lymphocele. We conclude that the use of mesh in the primary closure of the incision after renal transplantation is safe and has minimal complications.

Compartment Syndromes↗