Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11085108

[Doping].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Kawahara. 2000. [Doping].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11085108/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Confirmatory analysis of residues of stanozolol and its major metabolite in bovine urine by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

A reliable method for the confirmation of the synthetic hormone stanozolol and its major metabolite, 16beta-hydroxystanozolol, in bovine urine by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry has been developed. [2H3]Stanozolol was used as internal standard. Sample preparation involved enzymatic hydrolysis, liquid-liquid extraction and purification on an amino solid-phase extraction column. The analytes were ionized using atmospheric pressure chemical ionization with a heated nebulizer interface operating in the positive ion mode, where only the protonated molecules, [M+H]+, at m/z 329 and m/z 345, for stanozolol and 16beta-hydroxystanozolol, respectively, were generated. These served as precursor ions for collision-induced dissociation and three diagnostic product ions for each analyte were identified for the unambiguous hormone confirmation by selected reaction monitoring liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The accuracy ranged from 19.7 to 14.9% and from 18.9 to 13.2% for stanozolol and 16beta-hydroxystanozolol, respectively. The precision ranged from 12.4 to 2.4% and from 13.1 to 1.8% for stanozolol and 16beta-hydroxystanozolol, respectively. The limit of quantification of the method was 1 ng/ml in the bovine urine for both stanozolol and 16beta-hydroxystanozolol. The developed method fulfils the European Union requirements for confirmatory methods.

Anabolic Agents↗

Automated sample preparation and gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis of urinary androgenic anabolic steroids.

This paper presents an automated method for extracting anabolic agents from urine samples for their GC-MS analysis by selected-ion monitoring. The sample preparation was carried out in a Hewlett-Packard 7686 SPE PrepStation system. Each 0.6-ml aliquot was hydrolyzed, extracted, dried and trimethylsilyl (TMS) derivatized in a 2-ml vial without any hands-on labor. When sample preparation was finished 2 microl of the extract was injected into the gas chromatograph by split (1:10) mode. Due to the small amount of free space in the 2-ml vials for handling the sample, parameters like time of hydrolysis, type of shaking, number of extractions and some TMS derivatization parameters had to be adjusted to achieve the best recovery for all of the compounds in the screening. Manual and automated sample preparation schemes were compared in terms of linearity, precision, accuracy, limit of detection and recovery data. When large concentrations were analyzed using the automated method no carry-over effect was observed.

Anabolic Agents↗

A randomized efficacy and safety trial of oxandrolone in the treatment of Duchenne dystrophy.

BACKGROUND: A pilot study suggested that oxandrolone, an anabolic steroid, improved strength in boys with Duchenne dystrophy (DD) and indicated the need for a more definitive study. METHODS: A 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of oxandrolone in boys with an established diagnosis of DD, using the change from baseline to 6 months in the average muscle strength score (MMT) as the primary efficacy measure. RESULTS: The mean change from baseline for the oxandrolone group was +0.035 and that for the placebo group was -0.140. Although the oxandrolone group did not get worse and the placebo patients showed some deterioration in strength, the difference was not significant (p = 0.13). The average of the four quantitative muscle tests (QMT) showed a significant improvement in the oxandrolone-treated boys as compared with placebo. No adverse reactions attributable to oxandrolone were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Although oxandrolone did not produce a significant change in the average manual muscle strength score as compared with placebo, the mean change in QMT was significant. Because oxandrolone is safe, accelerates linear growth, and may have some beneficial effect in slowing the progress of weakness, it may be useful before initiating corticosteroid therapy.

Anabolic Agents↗