Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11079892

Computer needs assessment based on nursing tasks.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to validate the Nurse Task Computer Use (NTCU) scale as a measure of the impact of computer use on tasks performed by nurses. It was expected that evaluation of a computer system by tasks is a better measure of nursing satisfaction. We used four strategies to accomplish validation. Initially, we used taxonomy of nursing interventions developed by Susan Grobe as a basis for identifying tasks. Next, using factor analysis, the results of the NTCU was compared to two validated user satisfaction scales. The third validation strategy consisted of comparing responses to the survey with interview findings for similarity, additional responses, and reoccurring patterns. Finally, findings from the results of the NTCU were compared to the Computers in Medical Care values survey. Results generally supported the validity and reliability of this instrument.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Gohlinghorst, C Weir, T Nutt, C McCarthy. 2000. Computer needs assessment based on nursing tasks.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11079892/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Practices and attitudes of Japanese oncologists and palliative care physicians concerning terminal sedation: a nationwide survey.

PURPOSE: To clarify the frequency of practice of sedation therapy for terminally ill cancer patients and to identify physicians' attitudes toward sedation. METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to 1,436 Japanese oncologists and palliative care physicians with a request to report their practice of and attitudes toward palliative sedation therapy. RESULTS: A total of 697 physicians returned questionnaires (response rate, 49.6%). Use of mild, intermittent-deep, or continuous-deep sedation for physical and psychologic distress was reported by 89% and 64%, 70% and 46%, and 66% and 38%, respectively. In vignettes in which physicians were asked whether they would use sedation for a patient with refractory dyspnea or with existential distress, 14% and 15%, respectively, chose continuous-deep sedation as a strong possibility. Those physicians less confident with psychologic care and with higher levels of professional burnout were more likely to choose continuous-deep sedation. In vignettes in which they were asked whether they use sedation for a patient with depression or delirium, 39% and 31%, respectively, considered psychiatric treatment to be a strong possibility, and 42% and 50% regarded continuous-deep sedation as a potential treatment option. Physicians less involved in caring for the terminally ill and less specialized in palliative medicine were significantly less likely to choose psychiatric treatment. CONCLUSION: Sedation is frequently used for severe physical and psychologic distress of cancer patients. Physicians' clinical experiences with the terminally ill and their levels of professional burnout influence the decisions. Training and education for physicians in regard to end-of-life care and valid clinical guidelines for palliative sedation therapy are necessary.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗