Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11061873

Pelvic prolapse.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pelvic prolapse is a common problem affecting women of all ages. We reviewed the pathophysiology, presentation, evaluation and treatment of pelvic prolapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We comprehensively reviewed the literature using MEDLINE, resources cited in those peer reviewed articles and abstracts from recent international meetings. RESULTS: Pelvic prolapse involves the herniation of various portions of the vaginal wall. Symptoms vary according to the area of the vagina affected. Proper evaluation is imperative for providing proper treatment. Various surgical approaches to repair have been developed and techniques continue to evolve. CONCLUSIONS: With the increasing involvement of urologists in the treatment of pelvic prolapse it is essential for us to become familiar with the anatomy, and the evaluation and management options available. We provide an overview of the care of patients with pelvic prolapse.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K C Kobashi, G E Leach. 2000. Pelvic prolapse.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11061873/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Perceptions of stroke in the general public and patients with stroke: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: To gain insight into people's thoughts on stroke and to inform the development of educational strategies in the community. DESIGN: Focus group discussions: two groups of people who had a stroke and their carers, and two groups of members of the general public. SETTING: New South Wales, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 35 people participated: 11 from the general public, 14 people who had had a stroke, and 10 carers or partners. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Views on risk factors, symptoms, treatment, information resources, and prevention. RESULTS: All groups reported similar knowledge of risk factors. People generally mentioned stress, diet, high blood pressure, age, and smoking as causes of stroke. Participants in the community group gave little attention to symptoms. Some participants who had had a stroke did not initially identify their experience as stroke because the symptoms were not the same as those they had read about. There were mixed feelings about the extent of involvement in management decisions during hospital admission. Some felt sufficiently involved, some wanted to be more involved, and others felt incapable of being actively involved. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms of stroke are not easy to recognise because they vary so much. Presentation of information about stroke by hospital and community health services should be improved. Simple and understandable educational materials should be developed and their effectiveness monitored.

Diagnosis, Differential↗