Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11060700

Therapeutic developments in multiple sclerosis.

Abstract

Recently there have been considerable advances made in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. For the first time since its initial clinical description in the 1800s, there are now available several medications which unequivocally exert favourable clinical effects through the lowering of the biological activity of the human illness. The therapeutic efficacy of IFN-beta preparations seems particularly well established in this regard on the basis of five large, independent, trials of this agent. These trials have demonstrated remarkably consistent reductions in both attack rates and disability levels using a combination of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcome measures. The therapeutic benefit of glatiramer acetate also has been well established, although there is less available data on this agent than there is for interferon. It is important to recognise, however, that, although these agents represent an important first step in the management of patients with multiple sclerosis, they are only partial therapies. In order to actually cure the illness or even to substantially improve patient outcome we need considerably better agents than we have currently. Nevertheless, it is likely that, with improved knowledge of the role that interferon beta plays in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis and with better understanding of the mechanism by which glatiramer acetate exerts its therapeutic effect, greatly improved therapeutic agents will be available in the future. In addition, it seems likely that, in the future (by analogy to the experience in oncology), we will begin utilising combinations of therapies in order to better control the biological activity of this debilitating disease. Such combination therapy will almost certainly include combinations of partially effective agents as well as combinations of these agents with other medications (e.g., the immunosuppressive drugs) which, by themselves, have only been demonstrated to exert marginal clinical benefits on the course of illness. Moreover, it also seems likely that, increasingly, therapeutic strategies that enhance or promote myelin repair will become a major focus of clinical research in this area.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D S Goodin. 2000. Therapeutic developments in multiple sclerosis.. https://doi.org/10.1517/13543784.9.4.655

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Mistletoe for cancer? A systematic review of randomised clinical trials.

Mistletoe extracts are widely used in the treatment of cancer. The results of clinical trials are however highly inconsistent. We therefore conducted a systematic review of all randomised clinical trials of this unconventional therapy. Eight databases were searched to identify all studies that met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data were independently validated and extracted by 2 authors and checked by the 3rd according to predefined criteria. Statistical pooling was not possible because of the heterogeneity of the primary studies. Therefore a narrative systematic review was conducted. Ten trials could be included. Most of the studies had considerable weaknesses in terms of study design, reporting or both. Some of the weaker studies implied benefits of mistletoe extracts, particularly in terms of quality of life. None of the methodologically stronger trials exhibited efficacy in terms of quality of life, survival or other outcome measures. Rigorous trials of mistletoe extracts fail to demonstrate efficacy of this therapy.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

On the non-inferiority of a diagnostic test based on paired observations.

Non-inferiority of a diagnostic test to the standard or the optimum test is a common issue in medical research. Often we want to determine if a new diagnostic test is as good as the standard reference test. Sometimes we are interested in an inexpensive test that may have an acceptably inferior sensitivity or specificity. While hypothesis testing procedures and sample size formulae for the equivalence of sensitivity or specificity alone have been proposed, very few studies have discussed simultaneous comparisons of both parameters. In this paper, we present three different testing procedures and sample size formulae for simultaneous comparison of sensitivity and specificity based on paired observations and with known disease status. These statistical procedures are then used to compare two classification rules that identify women for future osteoporotic fracture. Simulation experiments demonstrate that the new tests and sample size formulae give the appropriate type I and II error rates. Differences between our approach and the approach of Lui and Cumberland are discussed.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗