Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 11016671

Patch testing with neomycin sulfate.

Abstract

The recommended patch test concentration of neomycin sulfate is 20% in petrolatum applied occluded for 48 h (2 days [D]). In the current study, the efficiency of such a test is compared to results with other techniques using lower allergen dose than obtained by approximately 20 microl of the 20% substance. Efficiency of petrolatum and demineralized water as vehicles are compared. 16 neomycin-sulfate positive subjects were retested with serial doses ranging from 0.4 to 0.0085 mg/cm2 neomycin sulfate in cellulose printed on polyester squares and applied by both tapes and plastic foils. Additionally, tests were performed with the 20% petrolatum substance in Finn Chambers. Tests containing the 20% substance in petrolatum and in water were applied directly with transparent foils. Readings ranged from 3 to 264 h (11D) following applications. Results show that foil applications of a polyester square dose, that is 7% of the dose obtained with the 20% substance, distinguished between perfusion of subjects who were visually positive and not with any test in the study. With the same test technique and visual assessments, 2 subjects were false-negative but developed doubtful test responses with the Finn Chambers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Bjarnason, E Flosadóttir. 2000. Patch testing with neomycin sulfate.. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.043005295.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Dermatologist and family practitioner practice patterns for occupational contact dermatitis.

Medical practitioners have a role in the recognition of occupational contact dermatitis. The longer the duration of symptoms before diagnosis, the poorer the outcome. Our objective was to understand practice patterns, barriers and needs for early diagnosis of occupational contact dermatitis. A survey to obtain information on practice patterns was developed based on the literature and interviews with dermatologists and family practitioners. The survey was sent to all dermatologists and a random sample of 600 family practitioners in Ontario. Fifty-seven per cent of dermatologists and 9% of family practitioners report seeing more than 20 patients per year with occupational contact dermatitis. The majority of practitioners report taking a workplace exposure history. Barriers to taking a workplace exposure history include time constraints and lack of knowledge. Reasons for referral to specialists include a lack of expertise, testing facilities and knowledge about workers' compensation, time constraints and inadequate reimbursement, whereas lack of access to specialists is a barrier for referral. Although most practitioners identify a need for further education, a low volume of patients and time constraints are key barriers to continuing education. Opportunities are identified to improve educational initiatives and health services delivery for occupational contact dermatitis, tailored to each practitioner group.

Dermatitis, Allergic Contact↗