Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 1100133

Analysis of data from multiclinic experiments.

Abstract

The analysis of data from multiclinic experiments is put in the framework of a mixed model in which the treatment effects are assumed to be fixed, and clinic and clinic by treatment effects are assumed to be random. The analysis in the unbalanced case is developed under the usual mixed model assumptions. The maximum likelihood estimates and likelihood ratio tests of the parameters are derived following the approach of Hemmerle and Hartley (1973). The T2 test is shown to be asymptotically equivalent to the analysis of variance F test in the balanced case. The distribution of the test statistic in the case of proportional cell frequencies is also discussed. Some investigation is made of the distribution of the test statistic by applying the method of Box (1954).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S R Chakravorti, J E Grizzle. 1975. Analysis of data from multiclinic experiments.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1100133/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Central venous pulse pressure analysis using an R-synchronized pressure measurement system.

OBJECTIVE: The information derived from central venous catheters is underused. We developed an EKG-R synchronization and averaging system to obtained distinct CVP waveforms and analyzed components of these. METHODS: Twenty-five paralyzed surgical patients undergoing CVP monitoring under mechanical ventilation were studied. CVP and EKG signals were analyzed employing our system, the mean CVP and CVP at end-diastole during expiration were compared, and CVP waveform components were measured using this system. RESULTS: CVP waveforms were clearly visualized in all patients. They showed the a peak to be 1.8+/- 0.7 mmHg, which was the highest of three peaks, and the x trough to be lower than the y trough (-1.6+/- 0.7 mmHg and -0.9+/- 0.5 mmHg, respectively), with a mean pulse pressure of 3.4 mmHg. The difference between the mean CVP and CVP at end-diastole during expiration was 0.58+/- 0.81 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: The mean CVP can be used as an index of right ventricular preload in patients under mechanical ventilation with regular sinus rhythm. Our newly developed system is useful for clinical monitoring and for education in circulatory physiology.

Blood Pressure Determination↗

Beyond inpatient and outpatient care: alternative model for hypertension management.

Hypertension is a major contributor to worldwide cardiovascular mortality, however, only one-third of patients with hypertension have their blood pressure treated to guideline recommended levels. To improve hypertension control, there may need to be a fundamental shift in care delivery, one that is population-based and simultaneously addresses patient, provider and system barriers. One potential approach is home-based disease management, based on the triad of home monitoring, team care, and patient self-care. Although there may be challenges to achieving the vision of home-based disease management, there are tremendous potential benefits of such an approach for reducing the global burden of cardiovascular disease.

Blood Pressure Determination↗