Discography.

S R Anderson; B Flanagan

doi:10.1007/s11916-000-0017-3

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10998742

Discography.

S R Anderson·B Flanagan

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Discography is a diagnostic tool that has been used for many years. Although controversial, it provides a physiologic test for evaluation of a disc with a volumetric, manometric, radiographic, and pain-provocative challenge. Although it has a controversial past, when the anatomy and pathophysiology are considered particularly in relation to intradiscal pressure and applied loads (that correlate with daily activities of the patient), the interpretation of the results of discography become more objective and reproducible. As with any procedure, indications for patient selection are an important step in successful outcomes. The equipment and technique used for performing discography using a manometry system are described in this article, as are a review of complications and outcomes. Discography is a safe, accurate, reproducible, objective diagnostic tool when tested for volume, pressure, fluoroscopic changes, and pain provocation.

Explore related subjects

Fluoroscopy Humans Intervertebral Disc Displacement Low Back Pain Manometry Tomography, X-Ray Computed Journal Article Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

S R Anderson, B Flanagan. 2000. Discography.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-000-0017-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Virtual fluoroscopy: computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation.

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro accuracy assessment of a novel virtual fluoroscopy system. OBJECTIVES: To investigate a new technology combining image-guided surgery with C-arm fluoroscopy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Fluoroscopy is a useful and familiar technology to all musculoskeletal surgeons. Its limitations include radiation exposure to the patient and operating team and the need to reposition the fluoroscope repeatedly to obtain surgical guidance in multiple planes. METHODS: Fluoroscopic images of the lumbar spine of an intact, unembalmed cadaver were obtained, calibrated, and saved to an ). A was used for the sequential insertion of a light-emitting diode-fitted probe into the pedicles of L1-S1 bilaterally. The trajectory of a "virtual tool" corresponding to the tracked tool was overlaid onto the saved fluoroscopic views in real time. Live fluoroscopic images of the inserted pedicle probe were then obtained. Distances between the tips of the virtual and fluoroscopically displayed probes were quantified using the image-guided computer's measurement tool. Trajectory angle differences were measured using a standard goniometer and printed copies of the workstation computer display. The surgeon's radiation exposure was measured using thermolucent dosimeter rings. RESULTS: Excellent correlation between the virtual fluoroscopic images and live fluoroscopy was observed. Mean probe tip error was 0.97 +/- 0.40 mm. Mean trajectory angle difference between the virtual and fluoroscopically displayed probes was 2.7 degrees +/- 0.6 degrees. The thermolucent dosimeter rings measured no detectable radiation exposure for the surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual fluoroscopy offers several advantages over conventional fluoroscopy while providing acceptable targeting accuracy. It enables a single C-arm to provide real-time, multiplanar procedural guidance. It also dramatically reduces radiation exposure to the patient and surgical team by eliminating the need for repetitive fluoroscopic imaging for tool placement.

Fluoroscopy↗

PubMed2001

Radiation protection in interventional radiology.

There is growing concern regarding the radiation dose delivered during interventional procedures, particularly in view of the increasing frequency and complexity of these techniques. This paper reviews the radiation dose levels currently encountered in interventional procedures, the consequent risks to operators and patients and the dose reduction that may be achieved by employing a rigorous approach to radiation protection.

Fluoroscopy↗

PubMed2001

Inspection of lead aprons: criteria for rejection.

Lead aprons utilized by personnel performing fluoroscopy are routinely inspected for damage to comply with the requirements of hospital accrediting organizations. Fluoroscopic or radiographic examination of lead aprons may reveal imperfections ranging from small pinholes to large tears. Currently, there are no standards establishing a criteria for acceptance or rejection of lead aprons. As a consequence, many facilities have established arbitrary rejection criteria. Often lead aprons are discarded due to small imperfections, a practice that can become costly to these institutions. We have calculated increases in doses to the whole body for varying sizes of holes, including special consideration of the effects on effective dose equivalent when the hole is over the testes and thyroid. ALARA standards for cost per personsievert averted are used to establish a rational basis for criteria of acceptance or rejection of lead aprons.

Fluoroscopy↗