Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10969063

Preface.

Abstract

Efficient monitoring for the emergence of resistance to various antimicrobial agents has, in the face of global trends in resistance, recently assumed great importance. Many programmes have been developed to survey resistance, each varying in scope or emphasis as well as commitment to long-term monitoring. A programme that specifically addresses pathogens from populations of the most severely ill patients is the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC). This programme was started in 1997 to monitor carbapenem activity in vitro in centres using carbapenems because their prevalent strains were resistant to other beta-lactams and drug classes. Meropenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem and differs microbiologically from imipenem by having a greater potency in vitro against many Gram-negative pathogens and a slightly lower potency against some Gram-positive pathogens. Meropenem has improved stability to renal-based enzymatic metabolism, and does not require the addition of an enzyme inhibitor such as cilastatin. Material in this publication is based on the many abstracts and oral presentations delivered at recent national and international meetings including: the International Congress of Infectious Disease in Buenos Aires, Argentina (April, 2000); the European Congress of Chemotherapy in Madrid, Spain (May, 2000); and the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease in Stockholm, Sweden (May, 2000). All of the authors are active participants in the MYSTIC programme and bring to it experience in the design of surveillance studies and the detection of resistance mechanisms. Professor Jones discusses the most useful ways of storing and presenting susceptibility data to preserve the long-term value of all results. He argues for the publication of expanded study details and the limited use of MIC(90) values or susceptibility rates. Dr Turner has coordinated the MYSTIC programme, and he summarizes here the similarities and differences in the results seen to date between the Americas, Europe and centres in Asia and the Middle East. The Americas have been one of the most recently monitored regions. Professors Pfaller and Jones give baseline data for the USA (10 sites), Mexico and Brazil. Professor Goossen's article focuses on the results of MYSTIC in the European centres. Doctor Masterton presents a comprehensive overview of various surveillance studies and assesses their value and characteristics for the continued optimal management of infected patients.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Reeves, M Wilcox. 2000. Preface.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10969063/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗