Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10902134

[Allergologic diagnosis].

Abstract

There are two phases in allergologic diagnosis of respiratory diseases related to immediate hypersensitivity reactions: establishment of the allergic origin of the symptoms and identification of the causal allergen or allergens. In addition to the basic information obtained from history taking and physical examination, prick tests provide an easy, rapid, and low cost means of correctly identifying specific allergens. Laboratory tests such as serum assay of specific IgE can be useful when history and prick tests provide conflicting information, in exceptional cases when prick tests cannot be performed, or when specific desensitization is indicated. IgE assay is however of little use if prick tests are negative or clinical history poorly suggestive. The role of screening for atopy using multiple-allergen prick tests which give a global positive or negative result is poorly defined. Screening tests would be interesting if symptoms suggest, among other hypotheses, an allergic disease, especially if prick tests cannot be performed rapidly. Other atopy tests, such as total serum IgE, have little use. Finally, specific provocation tests are rarely needed for routine allergologic diagnosis. They may be useful in complex clinical situations or in particular conditions such as occupational allergy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Didier, F Rance, S Doussau, G Dutau. 2000. [Allergologic diagnosis].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10902134/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Capsaicin cough sensitivity in bronchiectasis.

BACKGROUND: Bronchiectasis is a suppurative airway disease characterised by persistent cough and sputum production associated with bronchial dilatation. A study was undertaken to determine whether cough sensitivity is increased in bronchiectatic patients. METHODS: Twenty two patients with bronchiectasis and 20 healthy non-smoking controls matched for age and sex were recruited into the study. Quality of life (Leicester Cough Questionnaire score), total cough symptom score, and extent of bronchiectasis on HRCT scans were recorded. Cough sensitivity was assessed using incremental inhalation of capsaicin concentrations; the concentration at which 5 or more coughs occurred (C5) was recorded. RESULTS: Patients with bronchiectasis had increased sensitivity to capsaicin compared with controls (mean (SE) log10 C5 1.22 (0.20) v 1.89 (0.21); p<0.03). Capsaicin sensitivity correlated positively with the Leicester Cough Questionnaire score (r = 0.64; p = 0.005) and inversely with the total cough symptom score (r = -0.58; p = 0.004), but not with the extent of the disease. It also correlated with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in litres (r = 0.58; p = 0.005) but not with FEV1 % predicted. Capsaicin sensitivity was not related to the presence of infected sputum or to corticosteroid or bronchodilator use. CONCLUSIONS: : Patients with bronchiectasis have a sensitive cough reflex which reflects the severity of cough symptoms. A measure of cough severity could be part of health assessment for patients with bronchiectasis.

Bronchial Provocation Tests↗

[Comparison of unspecific bronchial provocation during controlled and spontaneous inhalation].

Using controlled breathing patterns during inhalation of drugs is characterized by a high dose reproducibility which may be of advantage for bronchial provocation testing. In this study 30 healthy subjects with an anamnesis of atopy underwent in a randomized cross-over design bronchial provocation testing with methacholine either with the Viasys-Jäger-APS system or with controlled inhalations (AKITA-System) (controlled inhalation volume and flow). Measured was the frequency of positive test results. Positive test results were defined by a 20 % decline of FEV (1) or a 100 % increase of specific airway resistance (sRaw). There were no significant differences in the prevalence of positive test results obtained with both techniques: APS-FEV (1) : 8, AKITA-FEV (1) : 9; APS-sRaw: 18, AKITA-sRaw: 17. More subjects showed a 100 % increase of sRaw as compared to a 20 % decrease of FEV (1), which may be interesting in order to understand differences in the diagnostic information given by both parameters. However, there were some discrepancies: only in 25 of 30 cases (sRaw: 21 of 30 cases) the results (positive or negative) agreed between both techniques. Although the two techniques for bronchial provocation test showed some discrepancies, these data suggest that controlled inhalations may be an alternative to the APS-system.

Bronchial Provocation Tests↗