Balanced vs. slightly unbalanced selection.

L Sánchez Rodríguez

doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00715.x

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10886384

Balanced vs. slightly unbalanced selection.

L Sánchez Rodríguez

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Balanced selection, defined as that all parents have equal contributions to the next generation, is expected to minimize the loss of gene diversity and thereby to allow a steady increase of selection response even at very advanced generations. In this study, balanced selection was compared with two degrees of slightly unbalanced selection (equal contributions from most of the families) and with unrestricted selection (unequal contributions) in terms of the retrieved response and genetic diversity consumed (group coancestry) over 30 generations of selection. A simulation was used varying the heritability and considering two population sizes and two family sizes. Results showed that a slight unbalance can bring a favourable relation between retrieved response and genetic diversity when compared to balanced selection at low and moderate heritabilities, and when small families and population size were assumed. The implicit constraint of a constant number of contributing families imposed in balanced and slightly unbalanced selection reduced the likelihood of gene loss compared to unrestricted selection. I conclude that a slight unbalance often could be more favourable than complete balance regarding selection efficiency, and that gain retrieved per unit of group coancestry declined with further unbalance.

Explore related subjects

Founder Effect Genetic Variation Models, Genetic Selection, Genetic Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

L Sánchez Rodríguez. 2000. Balanced vs. slightly unbalanced selection.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00715.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2025

Combined Evidence Reveals the Origin of a Rapid Range Expansion Despite Retained Genetic Diversity and a Weak Founder Effect.

Many species are currently experiencing range shifts in response to changing environmental conditions with potentially serious genetic consequences. Repeated founder events and strong genetic drift are expected to erode genetic variation at the range front, reducing adaptive potential and slowing or even halting the expansion. However, the severity of these consequences for common and highly mobile species undergoing environment-driven range shifts (c.f. invasions) is less clear. Here, we combined historical observations and contemporary movement data of the common reed warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) with genomic evidence from across its European breeding range to (1) infer the origin and (2) quantify the genetic consequences of a recent and rapid northward range expansion. Although there were no reductions in levels of nucleotide diversity or allelic richness, nor a signal of founder effect in the directionality index (ψ), our combined dataset approach was able to infer an expansion origin from the southwest. Furthermore, we found that private allelic richness retained a slight but significant linear decline along the colonisation route. These results suggest that high dispersal capabilities can allow even philopatric species to avoid the loss of genetic diversity during rapid range expansions. Nevertheless, if multiple lines of evidence enable identification of an expansion pathway, we may still detect genetic signals of expansion.

Founder Effect↗

PubMed2007

Multiple mutations responsible for frequent genetic diseases in isolated populations.

The relatively frequent existence of an autosomal recessive disease in an isolated population suggests a founder effect. However, in many cases the high frequency is due to more than one mutation in either one or several genes. Several possibilities have been raised to explain these findings: a chance phenomenon, migration of families with affected patients or digenic inheritance. Although each of these possibilities may be responsible for a few of the cases, in most they are very improbable explanations. A selective advantage may explain most of the observations even if it is difficult to prove.

Founder Effect↗

PubMed2006

Haplotype analysis reveals founder effects of thyroglobulin gene mutations C1058R and C1977S in Japan.

CONTEXT: Thyroglobulin (Tg) mutations were previously believed to be rare, resulting in congenital goitrous hypothyroidism. However, an increasing number of patients with Tg mutations, who are euthyroid to mildly hypothyroid, have been identified in Japan. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the three frequently found Tg mutations, namely C1058R, C1245R, and C1977S, were caused by a founder effect. RESULTS: We found 26 different mutations within the Tg gene in 52 patients from 41 families. Thirty-five patients were homozygous for the mutations, whereas the others were compound heterozygous. The occurrence of Tg mutation within the general Japanese population is one in 67,000. Patients with the C1245R mutation were found throughout Japan, whereas those with the C1058R mutation were confined to a small village on a southern island, and those with the C1977S mutation were restricted to a city. The eight patients with the C1058R mutation and the seven patients with the C1977S mutation all showed the same combinations of 18 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the coding region of the Tg gene, which would appear in one in 810 million and one in 37 billion, respectively, control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The frequently found mutations, C1058R and C1977S, were caused by founder effects. This result suggests that Tg mutations may provide a genetic basis for the cause of familial euthyroid goiter.

Founder Effect↗