Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10865340

Developing and implementing an OSCE in dentistry.

Abstract

The processes of development, implementation and perceived usefulness of an objective structured clinical examination in restorative dentistry (OSCE(D)) are reported. An OSCE is a system of assessment. It consists of a set of standardised 'stations'. At each station, a student is tested on a specific clinical task. Each student moves from one station to the next so that by the end of the OSCE, every student has completed every station. The primary purpose of this OSCE was to provide feedback to 49 4th year students on their performance in the clinical areas of conservative dentistry, periodontology and prosthetics. Individual profiles were provided to students and the overall results discussed by staff. There were no significant differences in overall performance between genders or between students in the morning and afternoon examinations. There was a significant difference between performance in prosthetics and the other areas and there were some significant differences among the skill clusters of clinical knowledge, procedures, clinical reasoning, history-taking, techniques and communication. Students and staff perceived the OSCE(D) as a valuable tool for providing feedback. The development of the OSCE and the findings described in this paper will be of value to clinical staff who are developing OSCEs in all areas of dentistry.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Manogue, G Brown. 1998. Developing and implementing an OSCE in dentistry.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.1998.tb00039.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clinical governance--bridging management and clinical approaches to quality in the UK.

Clinical governance has, for the first time, placed the quality of healthcare as a direct responsibility of the Chief Executive and therefore the board of all NHS Trusts (Hospital), community providers and primary care trusts (general practitioners). The foundation for clinical governance was set out in the Department of Health Publication 'A first class service-quality in the new NHS' [Department Of Health, A First Class Service: Quality in the New NHS, London, HMSO, 1998]. Much of this had been precipitated by the Bristol cardiac surgery case and other series of medical disasters in the UK relating to cervical screening, breast screening, psychiatric care and pathological misdiagnoses. This new responsibility of clinical governance involves guaranteeing quality through a number of processes, many of which are currently in use and should be familiar to any clinician or manager. They include clinical effectiveness and optimisation of clinical care, clinical risk management, learning from complaints, professional development, good quality clinical data systems and involvement of patients and carers. This duty is equal to the other statutory responsibilities of NHS organisations, which are of financial probity, accountability and ensuring value for public money on behalf of the taxpayer.

Clinical Competence↗