Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10838273

Strategies to decrease costs associated with GBS prophylaxis in preterm gestations.

Abstract

Objective: 1) To evaluate the costs associated with a practice of routinely culturing women for Group B beta-Streptococcus (GBS) who are at risk for preterm delivery. 2) To evaluate the charges associated with a policy of empiric antibiotic therapy in women suspected of imminent delivery prior to 37 weeks gestation.Methods: In our hospital, women who present with preterm contractions (PTC), preterm labor (defined as uterine contractions resulting in cervical change, PTL), and preterm rupture of the membranes (PROM) were cultured for GBS. Women with PTL and PROM received parenteral antibiotic therapy pending availability of culture results (48 hours). We reviewed the records of women who participated in a study to determine the sensitivity and specificity of a rapid test for GBS (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:S35). Results of the Lim broth culture, our gold standard, were used for this analysis. The charges for performing cultures ($32/culture) and administering intravenous ampicillin ($54/dose) were calculated.Results: There were 118 women with PTC, 52 women with PTL, and 64 with PROM. Thirty-four (14.5%) of the cultures were positive. The results are presented below.In women with PTC, the incidence of GBS was 12.7%. The culture results were available and guided care in only the 6 women who delivered between 2 and 7 days. In women with PTL the incidence of positive cultures was 11.5%. All of the women received antibiotics pending results of cultures. The majority of the women had delivery delayed 48 hours until results were available. Care was modified in the 7 women who delivered between 2 and 7 days. In women with PROM the incidence of GBS was 20.3%. The culture results were available and guided therapy in 11 women.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that GBS cultures have limited clinical value in women with PTC. Only 6 women, 5.5%, had their care modified as a result of the cultures, at a cost of $3776. In women with PTL, we over-treated the majority of women with antibiotics, most of whom delivered after culture results were available. Cultures had minimal impact on management. Antibiotics should be reserved for women whose labor is progressing on tocolysis. In women with PROM, most delivered prior to availability of culture results. We would have saved $2048 had no cultures been obtained. These results are probably irrelevant, if routine antibiotic administration is utilized in PROM to prolong latency intervals regardless of GBS status.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Nguyen, DA Guinn, A Rodriguez, R Mehendale, EQ Quillen, LM Albrecht. 1998-07-01. Strategies to decrease costs associated with GBS prophylaxis in preterm gestations.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00028-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗