Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10830388

Feedback path variability modeling for robust hearing aids.

B Rafaely·M Roccasalva-Firenze·E Payne
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Acoustic feedback is a common problem in hearing aids with vented earmolds. Hearing aids designed to work under normal conditions become unstable when the feedback path varies under changing conditions. A comprehensive study of the variability of the feedback path under various conditions and for different users is presented in this paper. A multiplicative uncertainty bound widely used in H-infinity robust control is suggested to model the variations, which is then used to formulate a robust stability condition for the hearing aid. The upper limit of the closed-loop acoustic gain of the hearing aid for maintaining robust stability is also derived. Examples of robust constant amplification hearing aids, which maintain stability in the face of the given variations in the feedback path, are presented. The robust stability condition is also suggested as a tool to design more robust digital, hearing aids.

Explore related subjects

Acoustic StimulationEquipment DesignFeedbackHearing AidsHumansModels, BiologicalJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Rafaely, M Roccasalva-Firenze, E Payne. 2000. Feedback path variability modeling for robust hearing aids.. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428652

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Topography of the auditory evoked potential in humans reflects differences between vowels embedded in pseudo-words.

To study the processing of vowels embedded in more complex linguistic structures, we compared cortical responses for pseudo-words. Auditory evoked potentials were recorded in 11 right-handed females using a passive oddball paradigm, with /pemu/ and /pomu/ as standard stimuli, differing only with respect to the first syllable. Topographic differences in the N100 were observed between the standards: /pemu/ had larger amplitudes than /pomu/ at more posterior electrode sites whereas a reverse pattern was found at more anterior positions along the midline. This topographic difference can be explained by different generators for the two stimuli. Different vowels and/or the initial formant transition possibly activate different neural populations in the auditory cortex, also when the vowels are embedded in pseudo-words.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2003

Deficient auditory processing in children with Asperger Syndrome, as indexed by event-related potentials.

Asperger Syndrome (AS) is characterized by normal language development but deficient understanding and use of the intonation and prosody of speech. While individuals with AS report difficulties in auditory perception, there are no studies addressing auditory processing at the sensory level. In this study, event-related potentials (ERP) were recorded for syllables and tones in children with AS and in their control counterparts. Children with AS displayed abnormalities in transient sound-feature encoding, as indexed by the obligatory ERPs, and in sound discrimination, as indexed by the mismatch negativity. These deficits were more severe for the tone stimuli than for the syllables. These results indicate that auditory sensory processing is deficient in children with AS, and that these deficits might be implicated in the perceptual problems encountered by children with AS.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2003

Separate mechanical processes underlie fast and slow effects of medial olivocochlear efferent activity.

Sound-evoked vibrations of the basilar membrane (BM) in anaesthetised guinea-pigs are shown to be affected over two distinct time scales by electrical stimulation of the medial olivocochlear efferent system: one is fast (10-100 ms), the other much slower (10-100 s). For low and moderate level tones near the BM's characteristic frequency, both fast and slow effects inhibited BM motion. However, fast inhibition was accompanied by phase leads, while slow inhibition was accompanied by phase lags. These findings are consistent with a hypothesis that both fast and slow effects decrease sound amplification in the cochlea. However, the opposing directions of the phase changes indicate that separate mechanical processes must underlie fast and slow effects. One plausible interpretation of these findings is that efferent slow effects are caused by outer-hair-cell stiffness decreases, while efferent fast effects are caused by reductions in 'negative damping'.

Acoustic Stimulation↗