Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10813204

Constrictive (obliterative) bronchiolitis.

Abstract

Constrictive bronchiolitis (CB), also termed in lung transplant patients obliterative bronchiolitis, is inflammation and fibrosis occurring predominantly in the walls and contiguous tissues of membranous and respiratory bronchioles with resultant narrowing of their lumens. CB is found in a variety of settings, most often as a complication of lung and heart-lung transplantation (affecting 34% to 39% of patients, usually in the first 2 years after transplantation) and bone marrow transplantation, but also in rheumatoid arthritis, after inhalation of toxic agents such as nitrogen dioxide, after ingestion of certain drugs such as penicillamine and ingestion of the East Asian vegetable Sauropus androgynous, and as a rare complication of adenovirus, influenza type A, measles, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in children. In lung transplants, CB is the single most important factor leading to death thereafter. In one study, the overall mortality rate was 25%. However, at the same time, 87% of patients who were asymptomatic and diagnosed solely by transbronchial biopsy had resolution or stabilization of disease. Decreases in FEV1 from baseline can be used to clinically support CB in transplant patients; the term bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome is used to denote this clinical dysfunction, and a grading system has been established for it that is now widely used in the literature. Significant risk factors for the development of CB in lung transplants include alloantigen-dependent and -independent mechanisms. In the former group are late acute rejection and HLA mismatches at the A loci; in the latter are ischemia/reperfusion injuries to airways that result from the transplantation surgery and cytomegalovirus infection.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Schlesinger, S Veeraraghavan, M N Koss. 1998. Constrictive (obliterative) bronchiolitis.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00063198-199809000-00008

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

BACKGROUND: In fair-skinned Caucasian populations both the incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma have been increasing over the past decades. With adjuvant therapies still being under investigation, early detection is the only way to improve melanoma patient survival. The influence of incisional biopsies on melanoma patient survival has been discussed for many years. This study investigates both the influence of diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of residual tumor cells in the re-excision specimen on disease free and overall survival. METHODS: After (partial) removal of a pigmented skin lesion 471 patients were diagnosed with stage I/II melanoma and underwent re-excision and a sentinel node biopsy. All patients were followed prospectively, mean follow up >5 years. Patients were divided according to their diagnostic biopsy type (wide excision biopsy, narrow excision biopsy, excision biopsy with positive margins and incisional biopsy) and the presence of residual tumor cells in their re-excision specimen. Survival analysis was done using Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for eight important confounders of melanoma patient survival. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy was wide in 279 patients, narrow in 109 patients, 52 patients underwent an excision biopsy with positive margins and 31 patients an incisional biopsy. In 41 patients residual tumor cells were present in the re-excision specimen. Both the diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of tumor cells in the re-excision specimen did not influence disease free and overall survival of melanoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Biopsy↗