Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10811038

List patient system: straitjacket or a tool for developing general practice? General practitioners' experiences from a pilot project in Norway.

T Fjermestad·B Paulsen
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate attitudes and experiences among general practitioners (GPs) taking part in an experiment with a list patient system in four municipalities in Norway. DESIGN: A questionnaire distributed to all 160 GPs in the four municipalities after 3 years' trial of the system. SETTING: Primary health care in Norway. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The opinions of physicians on a list patient system after 3 years of trial. RESULTS: Most of the physicians held that the list patient system imposed more obligations than they were used to. However, the majority also held that the system enhanced preconditions for doing a good professional job; 68% wanted the system on a permanent basis, while 14% rejected it. CONCLUSION: Positive aspects outweigh negative aspects in the attitude of GPs to a list patient system.

Explore related subjects

Attitude of Health PersonnelFamily PracticeHumansNorwayPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysicians, FamilyPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Fjermestad, B Paulsen. 2000. List patient system: straitjacket or a tool for developing general practice? General practitioners' experiences from a pilot project in Norway.. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430050202505

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2007

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗