Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10769104

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: is the bone density decrease the only explanation?

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids may increase bone fragility via mechanisms independent from their bone mass reducing effect. OBJECTIVE: To study relationships between osteoporotic fractures and bone mineral density in patients on long-term glucocorticoid therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 121 women with a mean age of 60.4 +/- 14.3 years on long-term glucocorticoid therapy (cumulative dose > or = 1 g of prednisone equivalent, duration > or = 6 months) for rheumatoid arthritis (n = 38), polymyalgia rheumatica or giant cell arteritis (n = 26), connective tissue disease (n = 15), asthma (n = 14), another inflammatory joint disease (n = 14), or another condition (n = 14). The control group was composed of 125 subjects who had the same mean age and met the same exclusion criteria as the case group. Bone mineral density was measured at the lumbar spine and femoral neck using a Hologic QDR 4500 unit. In subjects with back pain, radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spine were obtained to look for fractures. RESULTS: The odds ratio for a bone mineral density decrease of one standard deviation at the femoral neck was 1.68 (1.20-2.35) in patients with a cumulative glucocorticoid dose of 10 g of prednisone equivalent and 1.67 (1.22-2.29) in those with a glucocorticoid therapy duration of 2 years. Sixty-eight fractures were recorded in 56 patients (46% of the overall patient group). Even after adjustment on age, glucocorticoid therapy duration, and dose, mean bone mineral density values at the lumbar spine and femoral neck were significantly lower in the subgroup of patients with fractures than in the subgroup without fractures. Sensitivity and specificity of bone mineral density at the femoral neck and/or lumbar spine for the diagnosis of vertebral fracture and/or peripheral fracture were 73% and 51%, respectively. In the stepwise logistic regression model, factors explaining the presence of fractures were as follows, in hierarchical order: age; absence of calcium/vitamin D supplementation, femoral neck T-score, and glucocorticoid dose. CONCLUSION: Our data are compelling evidence that bone mineral density is a major determinant of the fracture risk in patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Lespessailles, S Poupon, N Adriambelosoa, L Pothuaud, V Siroux, S Bouillon, C L Benhamou. 2000. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: is the bone density decrease the only explanation?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10769104/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Is there a causal relationship between resistin levels and bone mineral density, fracture occurrence? A mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND: In a great many of observational studies, whether there is a relevance of resistin levels on bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture occurrence has been inconsistently reported, and the causality is unclear. METHODS: We aim to assess the resistin levels on BMD and fracture occurrence within a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Exposure and outcome data were derived from the Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) Open genome wide association studies (GWAS) database. Screening of instrumental variables (IVs) was performed subject to conditions of relevance, exclusivity, and independence. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) was our primary method for MR analysis based on harmonized data. Weighted median and MR-Egger were chosen to evaluate the robustness of the results of IVW. Simultaneously, heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were also assessed and the direction of potential causality was detected by MR Steiger. Multivariable MR (MVMR) analysis was used to identify whether confounding factors affected the reliability of the results. RESULTS: After Bonferroni correction, the results showed a suggestively positive causality between resistin levels and total body BMD (TB-BMD) in European populations over the age of 60 [β(95%CI): 0.093(0.021, 0.165), P = 0.011]. The weighted median [β(95%CI): 0.111(0.067, 0.213), P = 0.035] and MR-Egger [β(95%CI): 0.162(0.025, 0.2983), P = 0.040] results demonstrate the robustness of the IVW results. No presence of pleiotropy or heterogeneity was detected between them. MR Steiger supports the causal inference result and MVMR suggests its direct effect. CONCLUSIONS: In European population older than 60 years, genetically predicted higher levels of resistin were associated with higher TB-BMD. A significant causality between resistin levels on BMD at different sites, fracture in certain parts of the body, and BMD in four different age groups between 0-60 years of age was not found in our study.

Bone Density↗