Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10757963

Weaning parameters.

Abstract

Numerous weaning parameters have been studied over the past three decades. These tests range from easily performed maneuvers such as determining the breathing pattern to complex measurements requiring special equipment such as the mechanical work of breathing. Based on the available evidence, it seems that a negative weaning parameter may not be sufficient justification for delaying weaning trials. Clinicians wishing to use weaning parameters must be aware of the testing methodology and should consider adjusting the thresholds used based on individual patients' characteristics, including the estimated risks of each additional day of mechanical ventilation and the perceived risk of a failed trial of weaning. In a patient repeatedly failing weaning trials, parameters may help elucidate the mechanism for failure thereby providing a target for therapeutic intervention, leading to successful liberation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S K Epstein. 2000. Weaning parameters.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1078-5337(05)70070-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assessment of decision support for blood test ordering in primary care. a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Different methods for changing blood test-ordering behavior in primary care have been proven effective. However, randomized trials comparing these methods are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of two versions of BloodLink, a computer-based clinical decision support system, on blood test ordering among general practitioners. DESIGN: Randomized trial. SETTING: 44 practices of general practitioners in the region of Delft, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 60 general practitioners in 44 practices who used computer-based patient records in their practices. INTERVENTION: After stratification by solo practices and group practices, practices were randomly assigned to use BloodLink-Restricted, which initially displays a reduced list of tests, or BloodLink-Guideline, which is based on the guidelines of the Dutch College of General Practitioners. MEASUREMENTS: Average number of blood tests ordered per order form per practice. RESULTS: General practitioners who used BloodLink-Guideline requested 20% fewer tests on average than did practitioners who used BloodLink-Restricted (mean [+/-SD], 5.5 +/- 0.9 tests vs. 6.9 +/- 1.6 tests, respectively; P = 0.003, Mann-Whitney test). CONCLUSIONS: Decision support based on guidelines is more effective in changing blood test-ordering behavior than is decision support based on initially displaying a limited number of tests. Guideline-driven decision support systems can be effective in reducing the number of laboratory tests ordered by primary care practitioners.

Decision Support Techniques↗