PubMed · 10754545
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
P H von Hippel. 2000. The recombination-replication interface.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968-0004(00)01571-1
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Bacteria encounter acid stress under a variety of circumstances. Acid stress induces DNA damage and genomic instability, most directly via acid-catalyzed depurination reactions that generate apurinic (abasic, AP) sites on the deoxyribose phosphate backbone. DNA damage responses are important in bacterial resistance to acids. A recent report provided evidence that a DNA repair glycosylase, AlkX, which is capable of initiating the repair of interstrand DNA cross-links (ICLs), contributes to acid resistance by the pulmonary pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii (Kunkle et al. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 2024, 121, e2402422121). This suggested the possibility that AP-derived ICLs might contribute to the acid stress in bacteria. This idea is predicated on earlier work showing that AP sites can generate ICLs via reactions of the ring-opened AP aldehyde with the exocyclic amino groups of nucleobases on the opposing strand of duplex DNA (Price, N. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 3483). However, it was not clear from previous work whether AP-derived ICLs could be generated under conditions of acid stress. The results reported here provide evidence for ICL formation under conditions of acid stress via a sequential process involving acid-catalyzed depurination followed by cross-linking of the resulting AP site with an adenine residue on the opposing strand of duplex DNA. This supports the possibility that AP-derived interstrand cross-links could contribute to the effects of acid stress in bacteria, and proteins involved in the repair of these lesions could be involved in resistance to acid stress.
Endonuclease III of Escherichia coli is normally involved in the repair of oxidative DNA damage. Here, we have investigated a possible role of EndoIII in the repair of alkylation damage because of its structural similarity to the alkylation repair enzyme 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase II. It was found that overproduction of EndoIII partially relieved the alkylation sensitivity of alkA mutant cells. Site-directed mutagenesis to make the active site of EndoIII more similar to AlkA (K120W) had an adverse effect on the complementation and the mutant protein apparently inhibited repair by competing for the substrate without base release. These results suggest that EndoIII might replace AlkA in some aspect of alkylation repair, although high expression levels are needed to produce this effect.
MDM2, one of the transcriptional targets of p53, can target p53 for degradation in a negative feedback loop. The p53-related protein p73, however, can bind to MDM2 but is not consequently down-regulated. Here we demonstrate that p73 could transactivate the MDM2 promoter in p53-null cell lines. In p53-null cell lines, the level of MDM2 was increased by p73 due to increases in transcription and protein stability of MDM2. In transient transfection assays, inhibition of the transcriptional activity of p73 required a higher amount of MDM2 than that of p53. This is probably due to the fact that MDM2 can target p53, but not p73, for degradation. We demonstrated further that the level of p53 could be altered by a cooperation between MDM2 and p73, but not by transcriptional inactive mutants of p73. Expression of p73 resulted in a reduction of the ectopically expressed p53 in transient transfections or of the endogenous p53 induced by Adriamycin- or UV-mediated damage. These reductions of p53 were likely to be due to an increase in MDM2-mediated proteolysis. These results suggest the possibility that different levels of p73 in the cell may act as a mechanism to modulate p53 responses after DNA damage and other stresses and that an increase rather than a decrease in p73 may play a role in tumorigenesis.