Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10733721

Co-teaching: a faculty development strategy.

Abstract

It has been stated that faculty development programmes which are closely linked to particular teaching contexts are most likely to be effective. Over the past 10 years we have developed a model of 'co-teaching' for faculty development which is based upon this premise and which can be applied to any clinical rotation. In this paper we describe our model, in which paired physicians focus on developing their teaching skills while sharing the clinical supervision of residents and medical students. Through iterative phases of teaching, debriefing and planning, co-teachers gain experience in analysing teaching encounters and develop skills in self-evaluation. Teaching occurs in the usual clinical settings such as attending (consultant) teaching rounds, clinic precepting, and case conferences. We discuss our model in the context of educational theory and related literature. We support our positive assessment of the co-teaching model through the precepts of collaborative inquiry and case study methodology. Vignettes, taken from the experiences of the authors, are used to demonstrate how the model is used to develop effective solutions to problems and to help in the maturation of one's skill as an educator. Successful implementation of the model is predicated on the development of a truly collaborative process between co-teachers. We share lessons we have learned from our experience of implementing the model in different clinical venues, such as the contrast between teaching on a hospital ward or in the clinic. This collaborative process has been well received by junior and senior faculty participants in our institution for more than a decade.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J D Orlander, M Gupta, B G Fincke, M E Manning, W Hershman. 2000. Co-teaching: a faculty development strategy.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00494.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Monitoring standards of training.

In postgraduate medical education there will always be a tension between delivering the service and ensuring time for reflection and learning. The balance requires monitoring to ensure national implementation of standards and to provide an external review for hospitals. However, the current system in the United Kingdom of visiting by many different agencies is disruptive to hospitals and wasteful of resources. The North Western Deanery has worked with medical royal colleges to develop a co-ordinated system of visiting and reporting which is designed to share information and expertise while reducing the pressure on hospitals. SETTING AND MAINTAINING STANDARDS: Clear standards are published and hospitals are encouraged to measure their own performance against these so that they are able to address identified problems. The effectiveness of the visits depends on collection and collation of data, especially face-to-face interviews with trainees and consultants. At the end of the visit a structured verbal feedback is given to senior managers and clinicians in the hospital and is followed by a written report. IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF TRAINING: Systematic review of training placements by the postgraduate dean's team has resulted in a steady increase in the quality of training placements and a structured approach has given trusts a framework to review the quality of training between visits. The future must lie in greater investment of responsibility in postgraduate deans for routine monitoring of training placements to consistent standards, which would allow the newly emerging Medical Education Standards Board (MESB) to review deaneries rather than individual placements.

Education, Medical, Graduate↗

Subspecialty training: does it affect the outcome of women treated for a gynecologic malignancy?

A review of available direct and indirect scientific reports strongly suggests that subspecialty training increases the likelihood that the appropriate surgical procedure will be completed in women operated on for gynecologic cancer. It is likely that specialty care lessens the costs associated with diagnosis, treatment and surveillance, and frequently improves survival.

Education, Medical, Graduate↗