Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10721321

Dose response characteristics and basic dose distribution data for a polymerization-based dosemeter gel evaluated using MR.

Abstract

A safe and reproducible mixing procedure for the manufacture of a polymerization-based dosemeter gel evaluated using MRI (PoMRI) is presented. The dose response, obtained by irradiating gel-filled vials with absorbed doses in the interval 0-20 Gy and evaluated with respect to 1/T2, was found to be linear in the interval 0-8 Gy, with a sensitivity of 0.211 s-1Gy-1 (r2 = 0.998) at 1.5 T. Evaluation of the same set of vials with respect to 1/T1 gave a sensitivity of 0.018 s-1Gy-1 (r2 = 0.960). PoMRI and diode data were compared for standard photon and electron treatment beams. A deviation of less than 3% was found between the two methods for central depth dose curves as well as dose profiles (2 mm for electrons in the steep dose gradient regions). The importance of the method used for background correction for the reliability of the results was also evaluated. Barex (with a wall thickness of 1.5 mm) was investigated for use as phantom material and found to be favourable compared with glass. The results obtained in this study show that PoMRI has excellent potential as a 3D detector.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Haraldsson, S A Bäck, P Magnusson, L E Olsson. 2000. Dose response characteristics and basic dose distribution data for a polymerization-based dosemeter gel evaluated using MR.. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.73.865.10721321

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A technique for inguinal node boost using photon fields defined by asymmetric collimator jaws.

A technique is described for treating inguinal nodes when using radiotherapy in the control of pelvic malignancies. A posterior photon field treats the pelvis. A wider anterior photon field treats pelvis and inguinal nodes. An anterior photon boost to nodes is delivered using asymmetric collimator jaws moved across center line. Advantages of this technique include simplicity of setup and treatment (a single isocenter is retained, and no transmission block is needed), minimal dose inhomogeneity, reduced dose to femoral necks reducing the risk of femoral fracture, low risk of nodal underdose, and elimination of dosimetric difficulties inherent in electron beam boosts.

Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation↗

A comparison of multileaf collimator with conformal blocks for the boost phase of dose-escalated conformal prostate radiotherapy.

A multileaf collimator (MLC) is compared with conformal blocks for delivering the boost phase of dose-escalated conformal prostate radiotherapy. When using conformal blocks, the volume of rectum irradiated to 90% (V90) is lower (1.4+/-1.3%, 1 SD) for a three-field plan with gantry angles 0 degree, 90 degrees, 270 degrees than for a six-field plan with gantry angles 50 degrees, 90 degrees, 130 degrees, 230 degrees, 270 degrees, 310 degrees (2.1 +/- 1.3%, P = 0.002). However, when using an MLC in which the leaves and wedge are oriented at right angles, V90 is higher (4.7 +/- 3.0%) for a three-field plan than for a six-field plan (2.7 +/- 1.6%, P=0.05). The larger increase in V90 for the three-field plan when changing from conformal blocks to MLC is mainly due to the limitation imposed upon the MLC orientation by the use of wedges.

Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation↗

Pre-treatment dosimetric verification by means of a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device during dynamic delivery of intensity modulated treatment fields.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although intensity modulated radiation therapy is characterized by three-dimensional dose distributions which are often superior to those obtained with conventional treatment plans, its routine clinical implementation is partially held back by the complexity of the beam verification. This is even more so when a dynamic multileaf collimator (dMLC) is used instead of a segmented beam delivery. We have therefore investigated the possibility of using a commercially available, liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device (EPID) for the pre-treatment quality assurance of dynamically delivered dose distributions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A special acquisition mode was developed to optimize the image acquisition speed for dosimetry with the liquid-filled EPID. We investigated the accuracy of this mode for 6 and 18 MV photon beams through comparison with film and ion chamber measurements. The impact of leaf speed and pulse rate fluctuations was quantified by means of dMLC plans especially designed for this purpose. Other factors influencing the accuracy of the dosimetry (e.g. the need for build-up, remanence of the ion concentration in the liquid and bulging of the liquid at non-zero gantry angles) were studied as well. We finally compared dosimetric EPID images with the corresponding image prediction delivered without a patient in the beam. RESULTS: The dosimetric accuracy of the measured dose distribution is approximately 2% with respect to film and ion chamber measurements. The accuracy declines when leaf speed is increased beyond 2 cm/s, but is fairly insensitive to accelerator pulse rate fluctuations. The memory effect is found to be of no clinical relevance. When comparing the acquired and expected distributions, an overall agreement of 3% can be obtained, except at areas of steep dose gradients where slight positional shifts are translated into large errors. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate dosimetric images of intensity modulated beam profiles delivered with a dMLC can be obtained with a commercially available, liquid-filled EPID. The developed acquisition mode is especially suited for fast and accurate pre-treatment verification of the intensity modulated fields.

Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation↗