Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10696884

Standards for anal sphincter replacement.

R D Madoff·C G Baeten·J Christiansen·H R Rosen·N S Williams·J A Heine·P A Lehur·A C Lowry·D Z Lubowski·K E Matzel·R J Nicholls·M Seccia·A G Thorson·S D Wexner·W D Wong
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anal sphincter replacement offers a new treatment option for patients with severe refractory fecal incontinence or for those who require abdominoperineal resection for localized malignancy. The purpose of this study was to review the current status of anal sphincter replacement, formulate a consensus statement regarding its current use, and outline suggestions for future development. METHODS: Four areas of interests were selected: indications for sphincter replacement, continence scoring and quality of life, choice of therapy, and dissemination of new technology. A questionnaire regarding these issues was developed and circulated to working party members; its results served as the basis for this consensus document. RESULTS: Both electrically stimulated skeletal muscle neosphincter and artificial anal sphincter are options for patients with end-stage fecal incontinence. Electrically stimulated skeletal muscle neosphincter is also appropriate for reconstruction after surgical excision of the anorectum in selected cases. Avoidance of complications requires strict attention to sterile technique, prophylactic antibiotics, and deep venous thrombus prophylaxis. A standardized scoring system is proposed that evaluates both continence and evacuation. Quality of life is a critical endpoint for assessing sphincter replacement, and use of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons incontinence-specific quality-of-life instrument is recommended. As the efficacy of sphincter replacement becomes proven, dissemination of the technique should occur in a controlled manner to ensure adequate surgeon training, minimization of complications, and optimization of results. CONCLUSIONS: Sphincter replacement by electrically stimulated skeletal muscle neosphincter and artificial anal sphincter provide a continent option for patients with end-stage fecal incontinence and those requiring abdominoperineal resection. The guidelines offered in this document are intended to facilitate the controlled and safe development and acceptance of these new techniques.

Explore related subjects

Anal CanalArtificial OrgansDigestive System Surgical ProceduresElectric StimulationFecal IncontinenceHumansLumbosacral PlexusMuscle, SkeletalPatient SelectionPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality of LifePlastic Surgery ProceduresJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R D Madoff, C G Baeten, J Christiansen, H R Rosen, N S Williams, J A Heine, P A Lehur, A C Lowry, D Z Lubowski, K E Matzel, R J Nicholls, M Seccia, A G Thorson, S D Wexner, W D Wong. 2000. Standards for anal sphincter replacement.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02236969

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Rectoanal junction colonization of feedlot cattle by Escherichia coli O157:H7 and its association with supershedders and excretion dynamics.

Feedlot cattle were observed for fecal excretion of and rectoanal junction (RAJ) colonization with Escherichia coli O157:H7 to identify potential "supershedders." RAJ colonization and fecal excretion prevalences were correlated, and E. coli O157:H7 prevalences and counts were significantly greater for RAJ samples. Based on a comparison of RAJ and fecal ratios of E. coli O157:H7/E. coli counts, the RAJ appears to be preferentially colonized by the O157:H7 serotype. Five supershedders were identified based on persistent colonization with high concentrations of E. coli O157:H7. Cattle copenned with supershedders had significantly greater mean pen E. coli O157:H7 RAJ and fecal prevalences than noncopenned cattle. Cumulative fecal E. coli O157:H7 excretion was also significantly higher for pens housing a supershedder. E. coli O157:H7/E. coli count ratios were higher for supershedders than for other cattle, indicating greater proportional colonization. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis demonstrated that isolates from supershedders and copenned cattle were highly related. Cattle that remained negative for E. coli O157:H7 throughout sampling were five times more likely to have been in a pen that did not house a supershedder. The data from this study support an association between levels of fecal excretion of E. coli O157:H7 and RAJ colonization in pens of feedlot cattle and suggest that the presence of supershedders influences group-level excretion parameters. An improved understanding of individual and population transmission dynamics of E. coli O157:H7 can be used to develop preslaughter- and slaughter-level interventions that reduce contamination of the food chain.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed2007

Postpartum evaluation of the anal sphincter by transperineal three-dimensional ultrasound in primiparous women after vaginal delivery and following surgical repair of third-degree tears by the overlapping technique.

OBJECTIVE: Intrapartum damage to the anal sphincter is an important factor in fecal incontinence. Recognized lacerations occur in 0.36-8.4% of vaginal deliveries, and occult sphincter damage in up to 35% of primiparous women. We examined the role of three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound (3DTUS) in the evaluation of the anal sphincter in primiparous women after vaginal delivery and after surgical repair of third-degree intrapartum tears by the overlapping technique. METHODS: During 2004-2005 139 primiparous women without clinically recognized third- to fourth-degree anal sphincter tears were prospectively studied 24-72 h postpartum (Group 1) and 13 primiparous women were examined 48 h to 4 months following surgical repair of third-degree tears with the overlapping technique (Group 2). A 3D 5-9-MHz transvaginal probe was placed in the area of the fourchette and perineal body in transverse and sagittal planes and 2-4 volumes were stored. The parameters studied were: examination duration; continuity of the internal and external sphincters; occult sphincter damage; internal sphincter and external sphincter width-measured 1.5 cm from the distal margin of the anus-at the '12, 3, 6 and 9 o'clock positions'; length of the posterior internal sphincter. RESULTS: Scanning was possible in all women and the stored volumes were adequate in 127/139 (91.4%) cases. Mean examination time was 3.5 min. In Group 1, occult sphincter defect was suspected in 10/127 women (7.9%). These patients were excluded from measurement calculations, leaving 117 cases for analysis. The internal sphincter was consistently visualized in all the remaining patients (n = 117), while the external sphincter was fully visualized in 99/117 women (84.6%), and partially visualized in the remainder. Mean internal sphincter thickness was 2.60, 2.55, 2.60 and 2.72 mm at the 12, 3, 6 and 9 o'clock positions, respectively, and mean internal sphincter length was 3.34 cm. Mean external sphincter thickness was 4.15, 4.20, 4.21 and 4.20 mm at the 12, 3, 6 and 9 o'clock measurement points. In Group 2, 3DTUS confirmed anatomic abnormalities in all the women in the area surrounding the 12 o'clock position. Evaluation of sphincter tears and their position and length was possible using the longitudinal view. Thinning of the internal sphincter in the area of damage and thickening on the opposite side, the 'half moon sign', sphincter discontinuity, thickening of the external sphincter in the area of repair and abnormality of mucous folds, seemed to be common signs of third-degree intrapartum sphincter tears, even after repair. CONCLUSIONS: 3DTUS is an accessible and promising method for postpartum sphincter evaluation, that is apparently well tolerated by patients. Reference data for sphincter anatomy representative of findings at transperineal ultrasound in primiparous women in the postpartum period have been established.

Anal Canal↗