Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10691663

Technological processes to decrease the allergenicity of peach juice and nectar.

Abstract

Among vegetable foods peach (Prunus persica) has been recognized as a significant cause of allergy. The protein, which is considered to be the major peach allergen, has been named Pru p 1. Because peaches are consumed both as fresh fruits and after processing to obtain peach juice, nectar, jam, syrupy peach, etc., research was carried out to identify a technological process for production of hypo- or nonallergenic peach-based products. SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting analysis of extracts prepared from four commercial peach nectars showed that the Pru p 1 was not removed, and neither was its allergenic activity decreased by technological treatments carried out for nectar production. Some treatments oriented toward a removal of or, at least, a decrease in the allergenic power were assumed and verified at laboratory scale. A variable considered was heat treatment at 121 degrees C for 10 and 30 min: this treatment was not able to decrease the allergenicity of the Pru p 1 protein. Furthermore, the protein band was still present even after 60-min reaction with two different acidic proteases. The two technological treatments that were found to decrease the major allergen of peach were chemical lye peeling of fruits and ultrafiltration of juice through membranes with suitable cutoff. On the basis of the results obtained from this research, a processing flow sheet was defined to obtain hypoallergenic or probably nonallergenic limpid juices and nectars. These products may represent, besides finished foods, intermediates to obtain various products after addition of further ingredients such as pectins, sugars, and fiber.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

O Brenna, C Pompei, C Ortolani, V Pravettoni, L Farioli, E A Pastorello. 2000. Technological processes to decrease the allergenicity of peach juice and nectar.. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9906681

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Determination of fumaric acid in apple juice by on-line coupled capillary isotachophoresis-capillary zone electrophoresis with UV detection.

An on-line coupled capillary isotachophoresis-capillary zone electrophoresis (cITP-CZE) method for the determination of the fumaric acid content in apple juice is presented. A clear separation of fumaric acid in real samples is achieved within 20 min. The leading, terminating and background electrolyte of the employed system consist of 10 mM HCl+beta-alanine+5 mM beta-cyclodextrin+0.05% hydroxypropylmethylcelullose (HPMC), pH 3, 10 mM citric acid and 20 mM citric acid+beta-alanine+5 mM beta-cyclodextrin+0.1% HPMC, pH 3.3, respectively. The linearity, recovery, repeatability and detection limit of the developed method are 25-1000 ng/ml, 1.07%, 95.4+/-3.5 (+/-s)% and 10 ng/ml, respectively. Low laboriousness (no sample pretreatment), sufficient sensitivity and low running cost are the important attributes of the cITP-CZE method which was successfully applied to analyses of real samples of apple juices.

Beverages↗

Chromatographic determination of the mycotoxin patulin in fruit and fruit juices.

Patulin is a mycotoxin produced by several fungal species of the genera Penicillium and Aspergillus, but principally by Penicillium expansum on fruit such as apples. The occurrence of patulin as a natural contaminant of apple juice is a worldwide problem and international recommendations and regulations have been made for maximum levels permitted in consumer products. This paper reviews currently available analytical methods for its determination in fruit and fruit juices. Of these, HPLC with ultraviolet or, preferably, photodiode array detection is most widely used, although GC and TLC methods have also been described.

Beverages↗