Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10666876

[Pre-eclampsia and anesthesia].

T Grau·R Conradi·J Wacker·E Martin
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The management of anaesthesia in patients suffering preeclampsia has to be selected individually. There is a high rate of caesarean sections in patients with preeclampsia. Intubation anaesthesia or regional anaesthesia are commonly used methods and can be considered comparable and equally useful. In our opinion, the application of regional anaesthesia should be preferred, if the initial criteria, such as normal neurologic status and blood coagulation, are fulfilled. We believe in a considerable reduction of vital risks when using regional anaesthesia. Our aim was to figure out the risk-factors of preeclampsia and preterm maturity regarding anaesthesia management. Preeclampsia is a severe illness in pregnancy with a frequency of 5-10%. In 1997, we experienced 73 patients with praeeclampsia according to the definition of ISSPH. Mode of delivery was conventional in 10 patients, 2 patients had a vacuum extraction and 61 patients needed a caesarean section. The rate of epidural anesthesia for delivery was 51%. We used epidural anaesthesia in 6 spontaneous deliveries, in 2 vacuum extractions and in 30 caesarean sections. There were no problems with epidural anaesthesia and the outcome of mother and child was also considered to be excellent. We suggest to use regional anesthesia techniques whenever possible.

Explore related subjects

Anesthesia, ConductionAnesthesia, EndotrachealAnesthesia, EpiduralAnesthesia, ObstetricalBlood PressureCesarean SectionFemaleHeart RateHumansInfant, NewbornPre-EclampsiaPregnancyRisk FactorsVacuum Extraction, ObstetricalEnglish AbstractJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Grau, R Conradi, J Wacker, E Martin. 1999. [Pre-eclampsia and anesthesia].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10666876/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section.

BACKGROUND: Regional and general anaesthesia (GA) are commonly used for caesarean section (CS) and both have advantages and disadvantages. It is important to clarify what type of anaesthesia is more efficacious. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of regional anaesthesia (RA) with those of GA on the outcomes of CS. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 December 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2005, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to December 2005), and EMBASE (1980 to December 2005). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of RA and GA in women who had CS for any indication. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, data extraction and trial quality. MAIN RESULTS: Sixteen studies (1586 women) were included in this review. Women who had either epidural anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia were found to have a significantly lower difference between pre and postoperative haematocrit (weighted mean difference (WMD) 1.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 2.93, one trial, 231 women) and (WMD 3.10, 95% CI 1.73 to 4.47, one trial, 209 women). Compared to GA, women having either an epidural anaesthesia or spinal had a lower estimated maternal blood loss (WMD -126.98 millilitres, 95% CI -225.06 to -28.90, two trials, 256 women) and (WMD -84.79 millilitres, 95% CI -126.96 to -42.63, two trials, 279 women). More women preferred to have GA for subsequent procedures when compared with epidural (odds ratio (OR) 0.56, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.96, one trial, 223 women) or spinal (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.81, 221 women). The incidence of nausea was also less for this group of women compared with epidural (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.64 to 6.14, three trials, 286 women) or spinal (OR 23.22, 95% CI 8.69 to 62.03, 209 women). No significant difference was seen in terms of neonatal Apgar scores of six or less and of four or less at one and five minutes and need for neonatal resuscitation with oxygen. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from this review to show that RA is superior to GA in terms of major maternal or neonatal outcomes. Further research to evaluate neonatal morbidity and maternal outcomes, such as satisfaction with technique, will be useful.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗
PubMed2006

[Perineal regional anaesthesia: indications in gynaecologic and proctologic surgery and in obstetric].

Perineal and proctologic surgery is well known as very painful. The apparition of new specific needles, long acting and less toxic local anaesthetics and neurostimulation allowed reconsidering some old forgotten techniques. Those blocks appear really useful to optimize multimodal postoperative analgesia and postoperative rehabilitation. After anatomic review, authors describe perineal regional anaesthesia and discuss about main indications and advantages, in the eyes of their experience and bibliographic review.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗