Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10590728

Sex selection: the case for.

J Savulescu
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

There is a strong argument in favour of sex selection, based on respect for procreative autonomy--the autonomy of couples to decide for themselves how to procreate, and what children to have. Objections based on possible harm to the child, the parents, or society, are not compelling, particularly in Australia.

Explore related subjects

Ethics, MedicalFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansMaleSex PreselectionGenetics and ReproductionJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Savulescu. 1999-10-04. Sex selection: the case for.. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1999.tb123697.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

[A separation of public health ethics from medical ethics].

Until now there are only a few approaches in the German-speaking realm to establish an explicit ethical framework for moral issues of public health--although a need for public health ethics in times of SARS and avian flu is obvious. One deficit of the discussion so far is that there is no systematic separation of medical ethics and public health ethics. Thus, the core and interdisciplinary focus of public health is often not met. However, to frame discussions of moral issues within a specific public health ethics framework seems to be fruitful. This paper deals with the conceptual differences of medical ethics and public health ethics. The discussion helps both applied ethical discourses to sharpen their focus and strengthen their appeal. The author develops and presents a conceptual and normative frame for public health ethics and offers a concise set of ethical principles for the discussion of moral challenges in public health.

Ethics, Medical↗