Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10578619

MedBytes.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Ownby. 1999. MedBytes.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10578619/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Are dedicated bladder films necessary as part of intravenous urography for haematuria?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the use and assess the value of full-bladder films during intravenous urography (IVU) which, despite the widespread availability of flexible cystoscopy, remain part of IVU in many radiology departments. Materials and methods A telephone survey of all Scottish radiology departments where IVU is regularly used showed that half routinely included a full-bladder film in the series. The reports of all IVU over 2 years in the authors' department were analysed retrospectively. The index urogram of all patients with bladder tumours confirmed during this period was reviewed independently by three observers, and together with the initial radiological reports was correlated with the cystoscopic and histological findings. RESULTS: From 2625 patients, 139 (5.2%) IVU reports commented on the bladder; 1423 patients presented with no haematuria. None of the patients without haematuria, where a comment was made about the bladder, had pathological evidence of a tumour. Overall 121 of 464 (26%) new bladder tumours were diagnosed on IVU before cystoscopy. Multiple tumours were always undetected and large tumours were often overlooked. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its continuing popularity, IVU is a poor means of identifying bladder tumours and routine views of the full bladder should be abandoned.

Health Surveys↗

Evaluating pterygium severity: a survey of corneal specialists.

PURPOSE: Accurate and reliable evaluation techniques are essential for clinical and epidemiologic studies. This survey of corneal specialists was designed to lay a foundation for the further development of methods for evaluating and staging pterygium. METHODS: In a self-administered, mailed questionnaire, 213 corneal specialists rated the importance of nine symptoms, nine signs, and nine clinical tests for the severity of primary pterygium. Severity was defined as the present need for surgical intervention. RESULTS: The most important factors for determining primary pterygium severity were the extent of encroachment onto the cornea, decreased visual acuity, restricted ocular motility, and increased rate of growth. Many patient symptoms were rated as moderately to highly important. The questionnaire was shown to have good response reliability by test-retest comparisons. Cronbach's alpha was 0.89, which indicates very good internal consistency reliability. CONCLUSION: The survey identifies the priorities of experts in determining the severity of pterygium. More precise and clearly defined evaluation methods will enhance future clinical and epidemiologic studies of pterygium. The ranked list of pterygium signs, symptoms, and tests can serve as a guide for developing pterygium evaluation methods in the future. There is a need for a method that accurately and precisely quantifies the distance of pterygium encroachment onto the cornea and the pterygium progression rate. Furthermore, there is a need for an assessment of patient symptoms.

Health Surveys↗