Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10561887

Epilepsy. Key management issues.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy embraces a multitude of syndromes that produce seizures as part or all of their clinical manifestations. Collectively these syndromes are common and occur across all age groups. OBJECTIVE: This article discusses diagnosis, investigations and treatment of epilepsy with an emphasis on areas that provide difficulty to both general practitioner and neurologist and introduces some of the important recent scientific advances in epilepsy research. DISCUSSION: Syncope is often misdiagnosed as epilepsy, however, historical features are often sufficient to determine the correct answer. The electroencephalogram is not a definitive test for epilepsy but is particularly valuable in classifying the patient's seizure syndrome. When medication is advised for the patient, optimal seizure control requires reliable drug intake. Slow introduction of most antiepileptic medications improves tolerability. For patients with epilepsy refractory to medication, consideration of surgery or a vagal nerve stimulator is appropriate.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D McLaughlin. 1999. Epilepsy. Key management issues.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10561887/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of zonisamide (zonegran) in the treatment of essential tremor.

Medical therapy for essential tremor (ET), a common movement disorder, is often inadequate. We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide (ZNS), an antiepileptic agent, in treating ET. Twenty patients (mean age, 60 +/- 15 years) with ET were randomized to receive ZNS or placebo. ZNS was initiated at a dosage of 100 mg/day and escalated to 200 mg/day at day 14. Patients were evaluated by accelerometry and the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) rating scale at baseline and days 14 and 28, as well as the Clinical Global Impression (CGI-C) scale at day 28. At endpoint, subjects assigned to ZNS were taking a mean dosage of 160 +/- 50 mg/day. There were no significant improvements in the FTM total score or its subsections. Tremor amplitude as assessed by accelerometry significantly improved in the ZNS group compared to the placebo group at endpoint relative to baseline (-0.50 +/- 0.72 vs. 0.30 +/- 0.79 m/s(2); P = 0.03). On the CGI-C, 60% (n = 6) of patients in the ZNS group felt that their tremor was unchanged, while the remaining patients felt that their tremor was "minimally improved." Thirty percent (n = 3) of patients taking ZNS discontinued the study due to side effects (fatigue, headache, paresthesias) while taking 100 mg per day. ZNS did not provide significant improvements in clinical rating scales at study endpoint compared to placebo and was only modestly well tolerated. ZNS was effective in reducing tremor amplitude as measured by accelerometry.

Anticonvulsants↗