Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 10525855

Interventional MR: interstitial therapy.

Abstract

The rationale and results for interstitial therapies via interventional MRI in the treatment of tumors in various regions are presented. Different interstitial treatment techniques are presented based on varying technologies both for tumor ablation and treatment monitoring. Data are presented based on 335 patients, 29-84 years of age (mean age 59 years, 196 men and 139 women) with a total of 932 liver tumors, 16 head and neck tumors and 14 abdominal recurrent pelvic and lymphatic tumors. All lesions had been treated with MR-guided laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy (LITT) via 2516 laser applications and 1856 cannulations. Data in the literature are extremely varying depending on author experience, treatment technique, and the included patient material. In our patient material we were able to achieve a local tumor control of 96.7% depending on the size of the tumorous lesion, the topographical relationship, and the applied laser parameters. The overall cumulative survival rate of patients with liver metastases was 45.74 months (median 40.97 months, 95 % confidence interval 31.42-50.52). The cumulative survival rate of the patient group with hepatic metastases of colorectal carcinoma was 42.71 months (median 39.33 months, 95% confidence interval 33.26-45.37). In patients with head and neck tumors a relevant reduction in clinically relevant symptoms such as pain, swallowing disorders, or nervous compression was achieved in 11 of 15 patients treated with LITT. In 14 soft tissue tumors, such as pelvic tumor recurrence and lymph node metastases, a local tumor control was obtained in 68% of lesions. Interstitial therapies under interventional MRI guidance, such as LITT, results in a high local tumor control with an improved survival rate.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T J Vogl, M G Mack, P K Müller, R Straub, K Engelmann, K Eichler. 1999. Interventional MR: interstitial therapy.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050874

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Sister Mary Joseph's nodule as presenting sign of a desmoplastic small round cell tumor.

Umbilical metastases, also named Sister Mary Joseph's nodules, are well documented in the adult population and most often represent an underlying intra-abdominal malignancy, usually a carcinoma of gastrointestinal or gynecologic origin. They are indicative of widespread abdominal disease and are associated with a poor prognosis. An extensive review of the literature reveals only two such presentations in the pediatric population. A 14-year-old male presented with an umbilical mass, which was found to be a metastatic lesion of a desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) of the abdomen. The diagnosis of an intra-abdominal malignancy, most commonly a DSRCT, should be considered in the presence of an umbilical mass in a child.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗

Cytology of desmoplastic small round-cell tumor: comparison of pre- and post-chemotherapy fine-needle aspiration biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Desmoplastic small round-cell tumor (DSRCT) is an aggressive malignancy of young adults, which is amenable to fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). As this entity is increasingly recognized and biopsied, cytopathologists are compelled to become familiar with the range of cytologic features of DSRCT. In addition, postchemotherapy tumors may be sampled to confirm disease recurrence before planning additional therapy. This study was designed to compare prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy cytomorphology of DSRCT and to evaluate for distinct chemotherapy-induced changes. METHODS: The authors searched their respective institutional databases for all DSRCT cases with an associated FNAB. FNAB slides, immunocytochemistry, and cytogenetic results were reviewed. RESULTS: Six aspirates from 5 patients were identified, 3 of which were postchemotherapy. The postchemotherapy cases demonstrated cytologic findings not typically described in DSRCTs, including prominent and conspicuous nucleoli, discohesive single-cell architecture, and slightly larger cell size. CONCLUSIONS: Cytomorphologic variability was prominent in prechemotherapy cases, and no case could be classified as DSRCT on cytology alone; immunohistochemistry was necessary for definitive diagnosis. Chemotherapy increased the spectrum of cytologic features. The most notable difference between the 2 groups was a predominantly discohesive single-cell pattern with conspicuous nucleoli in the postchemotherapy group, instead of the clustering pattern of medium-sized cells with inconspicuous nucleoli typically attributed to de novo cases reported in the literature.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗